Part 1 of this series established the real goal of the association budgeting process. Part 2 presented a method of budgeting to learn from the past, see the present clearly, and plan for the future. The third piece got into the nitty-gritty, outlining the components of a budget. A common theme began to emerge. Budgeting requires discipline, and sometimes some courage. Having guts was a highlight of part 4 , where we presented strategies for communicating the results of the process, especially when sharing a difficult message. In this final segment, we identify the pitfalls we’ve seen managers, boards, and communities fall into and how to avoid them. Of course, we can’t close out without some final encouragement.

Avoiding Common Pitfalls

1. Communication Gaps: Never present a draft without a cover memo. Anytime a draft is changed, memorialize those changes and explain them, whether directed by a committee or board. Memories get short. Valuable history can be lost. Managers and boards get unfairly blamed for leaving things out of budgets years later. Allow the documents to refresh memories and tell the story.
2. Time Blocking: Drafting a budget is a great example of a task requiring sustained focus. Gather all supporting materials in advance and have them at the ready. Try to carve out blocks of uninterrupted time to the extent possible. According to some productivity studies, you can lose up to 50% productivity every time you put a project down and have to pick it up again later. This is not a time to attempt to multitask. It’s Time Management 101.
3. Fee Targeting: One of the gravest sins in budgeting. If the board or management comes into the process predisposed to a meet specific result (such as no or minimal fee increase), results are inevitably skewed. The values in expense line items must not be artificial. They represent real activity and have real consequence. Lowering an expense line item unrealistically may get the condo or HOA fee where you want it, but it is likely to cause an operating deficit. Keep it real!
4. Disconnection With Long Range Planning: All too often, the contribution to reserves is a number picked to help the budget meet a fee target at the end of a budget process. This is a blueprint for major problems. Interestingly, the Virginia legislature continues to modify the POA and Condominium Acts in attempts to require boards to maintain this discipline to some extent. We expect other states to follow as more citizens living in community associations suffer from special assessments and significant fee increases because of deferred maintenance and poor budgeting discipline. Careful consideration of current and future capital projects and a realistic funding plan to have the money available when needed are crucial. Including capital projects in the budget, along with a corresponding transfer from reserves- so that these expenses do not impact fees- helps establish and maintain a pattern of discipline in long-range planning. If your budget format does not allow for capital projects to be included in the annual budget, create a separate schedule and include it in the package.
5. Failure to Plan for Contingencies: Murphy’s Law reigns supreme – it pays to plan for the unexpected. This can be accomplished in two primary ways: an operating contingency line item, or an operating reserve contribution line item. The former raises fees to be maintained in the operating account until needed. The latter creates a plan to transfer a specific amount to a reserve fund each month for safekeeping until needed. It is generally recommended that associations maintain between 10% and 20% in unrestricted funds (i.e. not included in the replacement reserve account). Since associations are not-for-profit organizations, they do not budget for surpluses. That means there are only two options to build up contingency funds: hope the condo fairy comes by and whacks you on the head with her wand, or budget for contingencies. The latter seems more prudent.
6. Failure to Recognize & Address Reality: Chronically underfunded associations tend to exhibit the same characteristics – they budget too optimistically without consideration of the actual condition of the property and financial history. This is part of the value of the comparative spreadsheet. The end result is recurring budgeting errors, a vicious cycle of deferred maintenance, operating deficits, and underfunded reserves. Inspecting the property prior to the beginning of the budget process will help to avoid costly mistakes. Interestingly, we’ve noticed that associations that show only one or two columns in their comparative budgets and/or have no narrative to explain line items are very prone to chronic under budgeting.
7. Failure to Allow Include All Possible Options in the First Draft: Rather than force an artificial result by fee targeting on the first draft, it is much better to allow the first draft of the budget to be a “kitchen sink,” worst-case scenario version, packed with every contingency and idea that may have come up in the course of the year. This allows honest dialogue geared towards establishing priorities and making value decisions as the budget is pared down in a systematic, logical, and realistic way. In the end, there will be a real plan that just might work!
8. Failure to Help Owners Understand the Correlation Between the Budget and Their Fees: People love getting something for nothing. Don’t assume owners understand that the budget defines the services the association can afford. A little education can go a long way in building buy-in.
9. Failure to Separate Emotional Factors from the Business Decision (a.k.a. Making the Numbers Real): Many owners may intuitively feel they cannot afford a fee increase in any amount. It is sometimes helpful to break down the facts into numbers that are meaningful, such as dollars per month per home. A 5% increase sounds astronomical, but if a condo fee is $300 per month, that’s $15 per month – roughly the cost of 3 Starbucks lattes. If a 5% increase helps avoid a special assessment in the future, is it worth 3 lattes per month?
10. Accepting Reserve Study Estimates Without Careful Consideration: The reserve study is an essential tool to help the Association plan for capital expenses. But that’s just the beginning. The board and management need to make sure there is a real plan in place. 

Guts

A word about leadership and courage here – sometimes the result of due diligence is bad news.   As tends to be the case with mature communities that have been chronically underfunded, sooner or later the piper will demand to be paid. Significant fee increases and special assessments are not happy news, and it takes a measure of courage to speak the truth to those who do not want to hear it, especially in difficult economic times. The argument will be made that people can’t afford the additional burden, that’s it’s not fair for current members to pay for the sins of their predecessors, and that resale values will plummet if fees are too high. Leadership and management must be prepared to communicate reality. While fees have an impact on resale values, you can bet that a property in disrepair affects values significantly. Poor curb appeal affects more than just values, it affects salability. At the end of the day, it’s the Board’s fiduciary responsibility per the association’s governing documents to do what it has to do to maintain the property. Biting the bullet at some point is sometimes painful, but necessary. Hopefully, the association will learn from history well enough to plan better going forward and avoid having to make up for the mistakes of the past.

A Time Investment

Yes – careful budgeting is a lot of work. But it’s well worth it when you consider the benefits. Stick to the fundamentals and follow the disciplines practiced by successful community associations. Everyone will win in the end. Don’t miss the opportunity to make a difference. This is the reward of leadership. You can do this!