Tag Archives: change management

Book Review #4  – The 6 Types of Working Genius

I’ve enjoyed Lencioni’s books for a while now.  Many of them start with a parable, followed by his analysis and presentation of the concepts that it teaches.  It’s hard to beat a good parable for effective teaching.  I learned to appreciate the value of a good story when consuming the pithy, yet profound little books penned by Spencer Johnson, Ken Blanchard, and their co-authors in the 1990s and early 2000s.  Johnson and Blanchard are masters of delving deeply into a selected subject, which allows them to explain and teach without ever leaving the story.   Lencioni is tackling more complicated and nuanced subjects.  We need an outline to visualize and apply them.  Hence, the method of Lencioni’s madness.   And it’s all good stuff.

I heard a terrific keynote speech by Dennis McIntee, who uses Lencioni’s 6 Working Genius model in his work.  I was familiar with Lencioni, having gotten a few “Aha!” moments from his 2012 book The Advantage, among others.  I followed my usual pattern of listening to a book first.  Within the first 45 minutes or so, I knew I would need to purchase a hard copy to read and study. 

Lencioni outlines his analysis of work and process as a result of his personal frustration.  He was feeling persistently grumpy at work and wanted to understand why.  The feeling was particularly vexing, since he enjoyed both his company’s work and his colleagues.   If the semi-autobiographical parable is accurate, he stumbled into a model to help ensure that the right people were doing the right work and a strategy map tool. 

He begins by defining a framework for work in general, comprising three phases: ideation, activation, and implementation.  With that in place, he then analyzes the skills required by a team to navigate the phases, resulting in the identification of six “geniuses.”  The following is an oversimplified summary of the six points.  

Wonder – The “Genius” of Possibility

Wonder is the ability to see the big picture and challenge convention and the status quo.  It’s the stuff that visionaries possess, full of curiosity.  

Invention – The “Genius” of Creativity

Invention takes the “what if,” challenges, and nebulous concepts that Wonder poses and turns them into solutions.  Imagination and comfort with ambiguity lead to proposals for new ideas and novel approaches.

Discernment – The “Genius” of Intuition

The ideas and approaches presented by Invention are often not fully developed. Those with Discernment intuitively evaluate ideas and decisions, challenging assumptions with clarity.  This is a role Chantu holds for Association Bridge and why one of her titles is “Resident Contrarian.”

Galvanizing – The “Genius” of Rallying

Galvanizers turn ideas into action, organizing the work and inspiring others to take action. They are typically enthusiastic and leverage their charisma and passion.  These action junkies are invaluable in project launches and skilled at coordinating teams.

Enablement – The “Genius” of Support

Once things get rolling, someone needs to keep it going, support progress, and fill in the inevitable blanks that come with any project or work process.  This is where the Enabler shines, using their high levels of emotional intelligence to employ situational awareness and connect with others.  I used to call these folks “glue guys.”  They are the missing piece for many organizations.

Tenacity – The “Genius” of Completion

Those with Tenacity are the closers.  They are not satisfied until the job is done and done right.  No half steps, no unfinished business, and no details left dangling.  The ability to focus through to completion means they are less likely to fall prey to the next shiny thing.  They are the ones who you want on your quality control team.   

I have some issues with a couple of the terms Lencioni uses.  It seems to me that “genius” is a bit overstated.  Skills and talent areas, sure.  But genius? The introduction to a self-assessment on the website refers to them as “gifts.”  That, I can buy.  But I can’t choke down “genius” any more than I can get a mouthful of asparagus down my throat (apologies to asparagus lovers, but I cannot stand the stuff).  Hence, I put the word in quotation marks throughout this blog.

Additionally, some of the labels assigned to the six “geniuses” seem a bit odd.  “Enablement,” a word that carries a lot of baggage for many people, felt particularly awkward.  It was not until I purchased and eyeballed the book that I realized he had created an acronym. 

  • Many organizations attempt to skip the activation phase of work and proceed directly from ideation to implementation, often yielding less than optimal results or worse.  Activation is the phase that challenges the assumptions of the idea and undertakes the hard work of preparing to implement it.  I hadn’t thought of that before, but I’ve seen it.  He’s right.
  • Lencioni reports that everyone has two “geniuses” that are their highest and best use.   When their role involves working in alignment with these two, they are engaged and energized.  He says that we will have a level of competence in two of the other “genius” areas.  We can do work that requires these skills, but if we do too much, we burn out.  Finally, he concludes that all of us loathe having to exhibit the last two geniuses.  We will avoid work that requires them at all costs. 
  • Once you identify the strengths and dislikes of all team members, you can chart out the whole organization.  We’ve begun to use this tool in our work and already see the possibilities.   The mere discussion of “genius” profiles is an eye-opener.  Better yet, the results enable you to align strengths with processes, thus smoothing out pain points, reducing friction, and increasing fulfillment, effectiveness, and efficiency.    
  • You can visit www.workinggenius.com, pay $25, and take a 10-minute assessment to discover your “geniuses.”   There are plenty of resources on the site, many of which are free and downloadable as PDFs.  Good stuff! 

Lencioni reports that this is his most impactful work to date.  I can see why. This book and the body of work are a worthy investment of time and thought.

Just Don’t

Silly Human Tricks

We work/live/hang around with certain people for a while. We have experiences with them. We get to know them. We disagree on a few things. We begin to get annoyed with them. We draw conclusions about their motives. We remember the disagreements.

Here’s where it gets weird.

We strategize to get the results we want, with assumptions about evil intent and ugly history close in our mind and heart. We overstate. We accuse. We blame. They are doing the same thing with us. The disagreements deepen. On the surface, conflicts appear to be about the matter at hand. But just under the water line, the real conflict lurks. We are simultaneously talking about the issues of the day and the distrust of the past. These bi-level communications can last forever. Things bog down. Nothing gets done. History repeats again and again in the vortex of a vicious failure cycle. Dysfunction reigns supreme.

Sound familiar? Congress, anyone?

The pattern can set in with any organization where we silly humans are involved. The more emotionally or physically close the people and the longer the relationship, the more entrenched the pattern. I’ve seen it happen in social circles, in businesses, in families, and yes… in community associations.

Learning How to Break the Cycle

Breaking the failure cycle is not easy, but it’s achievable in most circumstances. It took me a while to appreciate the uniqueness of my career in the community associations field. Since my first on-site management contract, my main, though unstated, role had been to fix broken things and build trust. In the ensuing years, I was thrust into similarly challenging situations. I’m not complaining. The experience turned out to be the best education I could have gotten. It led to me doing most of the consulting for a management company and the formation of Association Bridge.

Here’s what I learned…

Don’t Let the 5 Percenters Rule the Roost

One of our silly human tricks is to focus on the negative. 95% of things might be working well, but we only focus on the 5% of that which makes us unhappy or divides us. Community association leaders and managers will always spend a significant amount of time fixing problems. It’s a big part of their jobs. But that can create a challenge. A constant focus on the 5% makes it hard to see the other 95.

I learned a secret. There is a reason people decide to move into a particular community. There are shared goals, values, and aspirations there. I’ve never worked with a community where its members didn’t have more in common than that which divided them. They just couldn’t see it at first. They were so into the weeds that they could not see the forest. The weeds are where the 5 percenters live and flourish. And yes, that includes those with wildly diverse demographics.

The problems are real. Different opinions are real. But the bigger picture is just as real. Getting out of the weeds of distrust and dysfunction requires elevation.

Get to Higher Ground

There are a few strategies that can help to elevate the discourse and begin to turn failure cycles into success cycles. Here are three of my favorites:

  • Use Affirmative Inquiry:  Identify that which members have in common. Establish shared values and goals. Then apply those to the 5 Percenters. Seeing the bigger picture helps to set a context and changes the game.  
  • Let Data Drive the Discussion: Much conflict comes from what I call “Theoryworld.” Absent reliable data, people will always rely on what they know – their opinions. Do the homework, communicate the data vigorously, and let that drive the discussion.   
  • Fresh Blood: Sometimes new leaders with a fresh perspective can help groups come together. In other cases, a “disinterested third party,” a facilitator with no dog in the fight, can help bridge the gaps.

Trust is almost always the key. Stephen M.R. Covey made an astute observation in his excellent book The Speed of Trust. When trust is present, things happen quickly and cost-effectively. When trust is absent, things take longer and cost more. Who doesn’t want cheap and easy? Getting to higher ground begins the process of melting distrust and creating a culture of trust.

Yeah, Sounds Great, But….

Does this stuff actually work? Here are some real-life examples of “Breaking the Cycle”:

Case Study #1

One association had an incendiary newsletter that torched the board over every decision. They undermined confidence and deepened divisions in the community. After about a month, I realized that its editor was a board member’s wife.

I expanded my “Board Orientation/Tune Up” program into a two-part community leadership program. The community had several committees, including the newsletter committee, which were contributing to the dysfunction to one degree or another. The first session was for all committee members and board members. This was followed a week later by a board-only session. There was a clear communication of both the letter and spirit of the law and governing documents. Both sessions included a section about best practices in leadership. We applied universally accepted principles to the community association paradigm. This created a space where the group could follow up with a productive planning session. They were able to agree on goals for the year and a program to reach them. Two years of progress ensued.

Case Study #2

Another condominium we took over had severely underfunded reserves and an unrealistic budget. They had also been the victim of theft from their prior attorney, who had pocketed the fees provided by members in collections. The stories were heartbreaking. Community members were equally upset about the condition of the property and the prospect of higher condominium fees. I facilitated a town hall meeting to share the difficult news. The Board, worried about a violent reaction, made sure to hire an off-duty police officer to keep me and them from being attacked.

By the end of the presentation with the data clearly shared, we had unit owners offering to organize to perform some repairs and property clean-up as volunteers. Once members saw clearly the reality of their situation, working together to find solutions became the obvious alternative to blame and complaint. Despite the increase in fees and many challenges, there was a palpable improvement in community spirit at the next annual meeting.

Case Study #3

At an annual meeting 16 days into a new management contract, I had a unit owner point her finger at me and tell me she was going to hold me accountable for everything the board did. In the ensuing months, she took full advantage of owner comment periods at board meetings to remind everyone of every bad decision that had been made over the last 30 years and to call into question board members’ intelligence. I got to know her and at one point suggested she consider running for the board to be a part of the solution. She declined. I still remember the look on her face when I told her that at some point the community would need to learn how to agree to disagree in an agreeable fashion. You would have thought I had two heads. After a pregnant pause, she whirled away and exclaimed disgustedly, “That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard!”

After a full analysis of the operation and a particularly vigorous and expanded budget process, the community understood the needs of the building and where their money was going. At the next annual meeting, my finger-pointing friend rose to deliver her usual diatribe, only to be encouraged to cease and desist by her fellow unit owners. Deferred maintenance projects were eventually initiated. The turnaround put this previously notorious community in a position to win a Community Association of the Year award.

The Bottom Line

We spend too much time and energy allowing our opinions get in the way of getting things done. We are missing opportunities that are right in front of us. Imputing the motives of others has no value. Even if you are right, it doesn’t help.

Stop. Just don’t. Find facts and stick with them. Get to higher ground. Focus on strengths. Find the shared values, goals and aspirations. Let that create context and culture. Put people in a position to be their best. And then…watch success happen.

The iconic Sgt. Joe Friday had the right idea…