Category Archives: leadership

Best Practices, community associations, condo associations, Cooperatives, HOAs, leadership, Management, Professionalism

8 Characteristics of a Great Board/Management Company Relationship

8 Comments

There are seminal moments in our lives and careers. One of mine was circa 1985. I bumped into  a board member of a condominium for whom my maintenance company had completed some projects. The question she asked me that lovely spring day on a bustling city sidewalk 35 years or so ago changed the way I approached business and I am certain it led to both my entry and inevitable exit from the community management business… “Tom, how come we can’t find a good management company? Are there any of them out there?”  My mind raced as I thought through the three they had fired, all of whom I thought were among the better companies that I had worked with as a contractor. I gave her a tactful answer, but one she did not expect to hear. More on that in a moment.

As a young entrepreneur, I had begun to immerse myself in the study of leadership. I started working with community associations a couple of years before that fateful exchange. I became fascinated by the dynamics of volunteer boards, their communities, and the managers who served them. A few short years later, in a joint venture with a management company, I entered into a contract to provide part-time, on-site management for a small condominium. Eventually, I left my business and dove into management full time for the next 30 years. I had the privilege of working with some great managers and boards. For much of my career, I was also the company’s designated “Fixer.”  If it was messed up, my job was to find a way to make it work. Of course, I was not always successful, but it was the best business education I could have received. Along the way, I saw the great, the good, the bad, and yes, the ugly. Stepping away from the management business and working with clients from the community association field in a different capacity and in different markets has reinforced for me how unique communities can be.  At the same time, I see common principles, fundamentals, and practices that produce results. So…here are eight characteristics that exist in the most successful and sustainable board/management company relationships.

1. Shared Expectations

The working relationship between a board and management company can be very dynamic and fluid. Times change, technology changes, society changes, people change, volunteers change, and properties age. These factors all may impact expectations. An agreement for management services provides a basis for expectation and accountability. It also needs enough flexibility to address the variables inherent in the relationship. COVID has been a testament to this. Who could have anticipated the workload and process changes that the pandemic would require?  Agreement on contract terms and ensuring that these are in harmony with the board’s goals is crucial to a sustainable and successful relationship, which leads directly to our second characteristic.

2. Communication

In my management days, I would receive the occasional phone call from a board member along the lines of: “Would you be interested in sending us a proposal for management? Our company is horrible.”   These days, the question is: “Can you help us find a new management company?”  My first answer has remained the same. “Have you spoken to company executives?”  Astonishingly, 90% of the time, the answer has been no! Changing management companies is a big deal. It can take far less time and effort to repair a damaged relationship than it would to make a change.  Talk about it, set clear and reasonable expectations, see if it can be fixed.  If not, then it’s time to move on, but not before.

Management companies can bolster the relationship by maintaining periodic executive-level contact with volunteer leaders, especially when the players change.  This may be after annual meetings, changes in board liaisons, and any time there is a manager reassignment.  Likewise, new boards are wise to get on the same page with the management team as soon as possible during these transitions.  Don’t let the relationship fall off the rails!

At their core, business relationships are human relationships.   Just like in our personal lives, we get busy, make assumptions, and don’t always get the message right.  Communications suffer and issues fester.  The electronic age makes this a bigger challenge.  Consumer expectations for immediate gratification (the Amazon effect) have challenged all customer service industries.  Businesses can rely so heavily on technology to gain efficiencies that they adopt a transactional mindset without realizing the negative long-term impact on the relationship.  Zoom meetings are great for efficiency, but we miss the cues that the full human interaction experience provides.  Tech and society will continue to change, but some things remain the same.  Community management is a relationship business.  Relationships require effective communication.  And it needs to go both ways.  

3. Mutual Benefit

All sustainable business relationships are mutually beneficial.  A zero-sum game benefitting the client will inevitably lead to poor management performance.  A company that can’t make a profit will fail.  Historically of the real estate management niches (commercial, rental, and community associations), community association management is the least profitable.  A review of the history of the industry and market pressures helps one to understand how we got here. The full story would be an article all by itself.  The net result is that community association management as a professional field has become increasingly commoditized.  Profit margins are always tight.

This can lead to the zero-sum game benefitting the company, which is likewise unsustainable.  Unintentional service creep can happen slowly over time with managers and boards losing focus on contract specifications.  A manager may lose focus of contract out of sheer work volume and when the board is unaware and seems happy with their performance.  Regardless of intent, the reality of this situation is that the relationship is being abused and could end badly.  

In the end, the old axiom is true.  You get what you pay for.  The logical corollary should therefore be that you should pay for what you get.  Maintaining awareness of and regularly revisiting contract specifications for any adjustments to meet the needs of the community are the keys to ensuring mutual benefit.        

4. Flexibility & Reasonableness

Great service companies will go above and beyond from time to time.  Community management is such a dynamic field that a manager will inevitably see the need to do something technically outside of their scope.  They want to make their clients happy and just take care of it.  But there is a danger of an unintentional death spiral. 

I’ve seen this play out many times.  Management agreements typically include provisions to charge for work outside the scope of defined routine services.  Many managers fear a negative reaction from clients and shrink back from noting that a requested service is a billable item.  Sometimes, the assignment is completed and that’s that.  Everyone is happy.  But sometimes, the requests keep coming.  The manager becomes overburdened.  The task list gets longer and longer.  The board grows increasingly dissatisfied, and the manager grows increasingly resentful.  All the while, more times than not, the board has no idea that they are making unreasonable requests because the manager never said a thing about the contract terms.   

When there is healthy communication about the best way to handle non-routine services, boards can make business decisions to allocate funds that allow the company to bring in the resources necessary to accomplish the task or facilitate service by an outside party.  Reasonable boards understand that a set-price contract cannot be a blank check.  (See Mutual Benefit and Communication) 

5. Get Out of the Box

Fundamentals and time-tested principles apply to every relationship, but every situation is unique.  One of the most valuable skills board and management companies can have is the ability to see things as they are and recognize when glue diligence (“that’s the way we’ve always done it!”) needs to be replaced by due diligence, which may involve finding a non-standard solution. This is where my experience noted in the introduction had such a profound impact.  The board member who complained about perfectly good management companies didn’t have a performance problem.  She had a system problem.  She lived in a 27-unit condominium with a seven-person board and half a dozen or so active communities.  Most unit owners were retired.  I loved that community because it had such a remarkable commitment to volunteerism.  If you lived there, you were on the board, a committee, or both.  However, the volunteers had no context to see how much management work was being generated by all that activity.  They were NEVER going to be satisfied with the level of time and attention a portfolio manager could give them under the terms and price of a standard management agreement.  They needed to adjust the system, adjust expectations, or both.

Without analysis, we easily default to assuming that people stink.  Just fire them and get somebody new.   If you can’t see whether you have a performance problem, a system problem, or some combination thereof (usually the case to some degree), you’ll always be answering the wrong questions. Wise board and management companies invest the time to make the determination and have the creativity and flexibility to change the system if needed.

6. Clarity on Roles

The board’s highest and best role to benefit their communities will always be to lead. It sets the culture, goals, and standards for the community and its management.   Everything a professional management company does can be grouped in one of two baskets – supervisory or advisory.   Most boards have no problem rightly holding management accountable for the supervisory tasks it performs on behalf of and at the direction of the board.  Highly functioning boards allow management to assist and guide as it fulfills its role. This allows the relationship to function at its highest level – as a partnership. This can involve helping volunteer leaders to translate strategies that worked in their professional or personal lives into the context of community associations and the statutory requirements,  governing documents, and best industry practices that apply.  Both parties may need to check their egos at the door: Board members might have to recognize the realities of an organization slightly outside their area of expertise, while managers who may passionately recommend a particular path have to recognize that the board is the boss and responsible for the decision.

Ideally then, as a leadership body, the board sets the targets (Why, What, and When), taking into consideration feedback and recommendations offered by professional management.  Leadership gives management the resources to accomplish the resultant goals and delegates the details (How) to them.  In that paradigm, management can focus on getting things done and reporting to the board.   The board can focus on gauging results instead of getting bogged down in the process.   For the board to stay out of the weeds and maintain a bigger picture focus, management must demonstrate competence and proactivity, and be willing to be accountable.

That said, there may be factors that make a certain level of “co-management” ideal.   Communities that are blessed with volunteers who have subject matter expertise and time may allow them to successfully achieve more without having to pay more for management.  Also, small associations suffer from the inequity of scale, requiring more time and attention than their management fees can reasonably command and making the co-management model more likely.

7. Get Things Done Without Being Pennywise and Pound Foolish

It is important to remember that a key role of a manager is to facilitate, not necessarily to do.  A manager’s area of expertise is the administration of the community, governance, and business aspects of community associations.  As such, they may maintain professional designations such as CMCA®, AMS®, PCAM®, and LSM®.  If they were also credentialed professional engineers, insurance brokers, architects, or licensed lawyers, associations would never be able to afford them.  Yet, some boards expect managers to provide opinions and services outside their area of expertise, usually to save money.  Wise boards understand that there are times when bringing in specialists is an investment.   Wise managers, especially those with high levels of subject matter experience, know how to leverage that knowledge and put their boards in a position to make good business decisions.

Managers may feel pressure to have all the answers and assume they are expected to have all knowledge at the top of their heads. As a wise man once observed, it’s perfectly acceptable to say, “I don’t know,” if it is followed by a comma and not a period. “Can I get back to you on that?” can be the best answer a manager can give at the moment. Wise boards allow space for a manager to provide accurate information. Wise managers don’t wing it. This leads us to the final, and perhaps the most crucial characteristic of great board/management company relationships.

8. Trust & Respect

I was thrilled to get an “Aha” moment when I was introduced to a principle that was so simple, so profound, and so applicable to community associations. The basic premise of Steven M.R. Covey’s The Speed of Trust is this: When trust is present, things happen quickly and cost-effectively. When it is absent, everything takes longer and becomes more expensive in the long run. Trust is everything. It underpins all the other seven characteristics. Boards need to trust that their managers are advocating for them and acting in their best interest. Managers and management companies need to trust that the board is dealing fairly and reasonably with them.  Trust begets respect. Both are essential to any highly-functioning relationship.

Let’s Do This!

There is far too much negative media about community associations. Certainly, there are bad players out there, but I am proud to be part of a field where so many dedicated people are working to get it right.  Whenever I hear a negative comment about boards, I always take the opportunity to share that my experience has been that the vast majority of volunteers I’ve worked with serve for all the right reasons. That is particularly impressive considering how many goofed-up situations I’ve been asked to jump into. The same goes for managers and management company executives. Those that stick with the industry tend to be incredibly dedicated professionals with a servant’s heart, qualities that are all too rare these days.  When community volunteers and the professionals who serve them choose to fulfill their responsibilities in a collaborative way and to an elevated level, it has a positive impact on the quality of life and investment of every community member. And they put themselves in a position, not only to leave a legacy of success, but to enjoy the satisfaction of a job well done. It is always worth the effort.

community associations, condo associations, Cooperatives, Culture, leadership, values

Culture – Let’s Get Intentional

Leave a comment

In our overview of culture in community associations, we noted similarities with other organizations, whether professional, non-profit, social, or familial. We highlighted that there are three primary classifications of organizational culture.

Like most other organizations, associations tend to fall into the “Unintentional” category. Time is a critical factor. More in-depth organizational analysis is most rare. Getting a volunteer board to meet for regular business can sometimes be a challenge. How about dedicating even more time to discuss values, vision, and mission? That might feel impossible. Let alone floating a full-blown retreat with team-building exercises.

You Can See Clearly from Higher Ground

And yet, when community association leaders invest the time to elevate the conversation, they find that it pays back in time and energy. Organizations create and perpetuate an effective and sustainable culture in which principled action is cultivated. Once identified, underlying principles lead to fewer ego-driven opinion battles. There is a context to the conversation. Healthy debate replaces unproductive arguments that suck the life out of the participants.

The result of such an elevated time investment sets up a principle hierarchy for decision-making that looks something like this:
• Values (The Why – what’s important?) drive Vision
• Vision (Where do we want to go?) drives Mission
• Mission (This is what we are about) drives Strategy
• Strategy (How do we make this happen?) drives Tactics
• Tactics (The day-to-day actions we take)

Flow the hierarchy backward, and it looks like this: Our day-to-day decisions make more sense because we judge them in the context of our strategy. Rather than reinventing the wheel or exhausting all parties by going in several directions at once, our strategy is in harmony with our mission. We know what we are about and what we need to focus our energies upon. This is because we have vision. We know where we want to go, and our mission gets us there. At the bedrock of all of this are our shared values. Certain things are essential. We’ve been honest with ourselves and compared our reality with those values.

That all sounds lovely. It might also sound like a pipe dream. It doesn’t have to be. Combine realistic expectations with some practical steps and you’ll get there.

All or Nothing?

Do you need the whole package of values, vision, mission, and strategies to start your intentional culture? No! And that’s where most organizations get stuck. Wise leaders apply the sage words of Arthur Ashe: “Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.”
Like many things in life, the journey may be more important than the destination. Developing the habit of a higher level, principled thinking is the first step. From time to time, I will start meetings with a touch of comedy: “So who are we and what are we doing?” It sounds like levity, but it speaks to a bigger picture and sets a tone. Keep at it, and the baby steps will eventually add up.

So How Do We Do It?

There is no one right way. Every group and situation are different. Some need to rise from the ashes of disaster to get the motivation to do it right. Most need to look for opportunities, however brief, when they can poke their heads up out of the weeds to see what’s already there in front of them.

Baby Steps: It doesn’t matter where you start in the hierarchy. Can you agree on a “Statement of Values?” Great! One or two clear elements of mission? Please write it down. A Vision of what everyone would like to see? Awesome! If you have an agreement in one of them, it can lead to more later. If you stick with it, it will gel over time.

Practice Affirmative Inquiry: We’ve always said the Parrado Principle has a slightly different iteration in community associations. The ratio of people and issues that drive the corresponding amount of time and effort probably isn’t 80/20. It/s more like 95/5. Unfortunately, one of the foibles of human nature is that we will dwell on the 5% that divides us instead of the 95% we have in common. But what we have in common provides the most vital foundation for success. Get in the habit of asking, “What’s right?” instead of, “What’s wrong?”

Be Mindful and Seize the Opportunity: Listen carefully. Pay attention to successes. Look for patterns. Shared values are always there, waiting to be recognized. Some clarity on vision or mission may pop up while doing business. When you hear it, call it out. Record it somewhere, no matter how rough.

Here is a good, natural, non-confrontational question to ask at the right moment: “So I think what I am hearing is…. Is that right?” If heads nod, follow with, “I think we just found a (shared value/mission statement point).”

Annual Planning Sessions: This simple practice can make a world of difference. Scheduling a special meeting to discuss what you’d like to accomplish over the next year can be a terrific jumping-off point. The most useful time to hold this meeting is as soon as possible once a new board is formed after an annual meeting. You may start with strategy, but by applying the techniques above, you may find yourselves painting a bigger picture. After all, if you tell me what you want to do, I will understand what’s important to you. Once I know what’s important, values and vision begin to emerge.

Change Happens…Use It!

People change. Times change. Perceptions change. Understandings change. Physical realities change. Adopted governing principles must grow with the organization in order to remain relevant. To prevent these principles from becoming a nice and shiny, yet irrelevant plaque on the wall (a precursor to the dreaded “Actual Culture”, these must be reviewed and challenged regularly.

If you are already following our recommendation to conduct an annual planning meeting, include reviewing your principles. This is especially important as you are going through the baby step process. It may take years to clarify your values, vision, and mission.

Why Wouldn’t You?

The gap between intentional and unintentional culture is the wherewithal and commitment to finding and memorializing what’s already there. Every group has shared values. Vision and mission are waiting to be found. Taking the time and energy to identify them creates a foundation that your association can rely on when it faces everything from day-to-day challenges to major disruptions.

Clarity in culture reminds us who we are and what we believe in. It saves us from situational thinking, conflicting direction, and wasted time. Any action you take to transcend mere tactics adds depth to your association. It builds team trust, commitment, and fulfillment. All upside with no real downside – so get to it!


community associations, condo associations, Cooperatives, Culture, HOAs, leadership, Uncategorized, values

Culture – The Missing Piece

Leave a comment

The culture of an organization either creates the space for sustainable, defined success or makes it difficult, if not impossible.  A healthy culture allows the organization to tap into the knowledge, talents, experience, energy, and intellectual capital of participants.  It does not permit ego, politics, or dysfunction to get in the way.

In this context, culture can be defined as the environment that establishes norms of behavior for the people in the organization.  It involves the connection between the goals and values of the individual and those of the group.  Culture is embodied in author Seth Godin’s statement: “People like us do things like that.”

Organizational culture provides the context in which the stakeholders understand their roles and can concentrate on doing their best. Healthy cultures in community associations put boards in a position to establish desired results and provide the necessary resources to achieve them.  Focusing on those results delivers rich payoffs. Building a healthy culture yields exponentially compounded interest in terms of time, energy, progress, and community spirit.

Culture is the difference-maker, and yet, community association managers and volunteers almost never talk about culture directly.  It’s about time we did.

Three Cultures

Organizational culture tends to fall into one of three general categories:

  • Intentional Culture- Values, goals, and norms have been identified, codified in some form, and provide the basis for principled action.  People in the organization are clear on “The Why.”
  • Unintentional Culture- Values, goals and norms are left to chance.  Defining them depends on who the influential people are in an organization at a particular time.  Frequently, decisions are made and actions taken on an ad hoc basis.  Sometimes leaders focus on rules and written procedures without explaining why they matter. Other times, there is no focus at all.  Everybody works too hard at reinventing the wheel or making it up as they go.  If such a community is fortunate, things will go well riding on the backs of a few good people.
  • Actual Culture- Values, norms and goals have been identified.  There may be mission, values, and vision statements with lofty aspirations printed on glossy marketing materials and plaques on walls.  Yet, leaders and members of the organization violate those ideals on a regular basis without correction.  The inherent hypocrisy of the organization destroys morale and trust. 

Most organizations fall into the unintentional category.  Their leaders may have no concept of culture or fail to recognize the benefits of the time investment necessary to build a successful one.  They cannot see that the hard work up front will significantly decrease their time and effort in the long run.  They are so caught up in the day-to-day operation that they miss the bigger picture.

What About Community Associations?

Why, specifically, do many community associations tend to have an unintentional culture?  First, boards can be mired in tactics, too busy putting out fires and stuck in the weeds to elevate their perspective.

Second, exclusive devotion to the standard board meeting model can cause an unintended consequence. Leaders and managers are trained to follow the legal requirements for board meetings.  They correctly conduct the association’s business in accordance with open meeting requirements and the standard meeting agenda.  Well-planned and executed board meetings are highly effective in handling the day-to-day business of the association.  However, regular board meetings are horribly ill-suited to address bigger picture issues, complicated projects, and strategic planning.  These discussions will never fit into a standard board meeting agenda in the best of times.  Switch it up by scheduling some town hall or special meetings to listen to what members have to say, get ideas flowing, and deal with big picture issues.

Getting to Higher Ground

Getting out of the weeds is not easy.  Leaders and managers first need the awareness that business as usual leaves too much to chance.  Then, they must recognize that the work to build healthy organizational culture is a time investment that will pay dividends.  For some groups we’ve worked with, it took disgust borne from crashing and burning to motivate them to meaningful change.  In our next segment, we will offer a roadmap to intentional culture for community associations. 

business life, Culture, leadership

What’s The Question?

Leave a comment

Everybody has a “tell” – that one, involuntary reaction that gives them away. Tells reveal themselves more readily in the face of crisis and stress. We may say that we hold to certain principles or beliefs. But when the fecal matter intersects with the air circulating device, an ugly truth may reveal itself.

A Test of Organizational Health

Pay attention to what happens when a mistake is made. What is the knee jerk reaction in the heat of anger or flash of embarrassment? If the first question is, “Who did it!?!,” you’ve got a problem. If that’s the go-to response, it is a sure sign of a sick culture. People in such organizations are motivated to stay under the radar. They fear sticking their neck out or owning up to mistakes- and for good reason! The culture fosters a fixed mindset that hinders the people and the organization from growing.

System or Performance?

Lazy leaders assume that every problem is a performance issue. The blame game is expedient, but it masks reality. When you fail to distinguish the difference between a performance problem, a system problem, or a combination of the two, you make false assumptions, ask the wrong questions, and get the wrong answers.

We’ve seen this play out in interesting ways. Sometimes the worst thing that can happen is having a superstar on the team for a long time. When they finally leave or retire, none of their replacements seem to make the grade. Only upon a more in-depth analysis of the situation does it become clear that one of the old superstar’s abilities was overcoming crummy systems. Their success masked the deficiency and set up their successors for failure.

Listen and Learn

If you listen to your organization…or yourself…and realize Bang & Blame (great song, by the way) has infected the culture, it’s time to change the game. How? By changing the question.

Organizations with healthy cultures react to errors and crisis with the following questions, in this order:
• What? Determine precisely what happened. Make no assumptions.
• Why? Was this a performance issue, a systems issue, or a combination?
• How? What factors contributed to the issue? And only then….
• Who? Now you can address the matter, take the appropriate action, and help people grow and learn.

Reality and Success

Without mistakes and challenges, there is no innovation, no progress, and no growth. As Tom Peters would say, “Fail forward fast.” Indeed, if the answer to “Who?” shows a pattern of performance issues, a tough decision may be in order. More times than not, there is something more to be learned. Follow the disciplines of a healthy organization. Ask the right questions in the proper order. You will create a space for yourself and others to see reality and the way forward. Your organization will take appropriate and forward-thinking actions, benefitting everyone.

community associations, condo associations, Cooperatives, Governance, HOAs, leadership, Management

Inequity of Scale – The Challenge of Leading and Managing Small Condominium Associations

2 Comments

Association Bridge was formed in large part due to my experience teaching CAI’s old “Essentials” program for community association volunteer leaders. Ken Ingram of Whiteford, Taylor & Preston and I were tapped to teach the full day program for a few years at Reston Association. RA member associations are typically very small communities known as “clusters.” By the early 2000s, some of these small associations were facing some serious challenges. The class gave them access to resources that board members in larger associations would probably take for granted.

I will never forget hearing a board president proudly explain his excellent system for keeping the books for his cluster.

“I use different color ink in the checkbook.”

“Oh, you mean to help identify different types of expense and income or something?”

“Well yeah, kinda…”

“OK, can you share the system with the class?”

“Sure. You see, everything in green ink is cluster activity, and everything in blue is mine…”

“Yours?”

“Yeah. That’s how I can easily separate the cluster activity from mine in the account.”

“Wait, are you saying you collect your neighbor’s fees, deposit them in your personal bank account… and pay cluster expenses from the same account?”

“Well…yeah.”

Yikes!

Time & Attention

Teaching the class was an instructive experience. Board members were searching for creative ways to get two things all community associations need if they are to be managed effectively – time and attention. I frequently heard the refrain, “Our management company doesn’t do ANYTHING!” Without fail, some follow up questions revealed the boards weren’t paying for very much of anything. Some gave up and went fully self-managed. They were doing a lot of work themselves to make up the difference between what they wanted from management and what they felt they could afford.

It reminded me that small associations have to make tough choices, all borne from the inequity of scale. Certain costs simply do not scale. Managing a 20-unit building will likely require the same number of site visits as would a 150-unit building. The time required to create board packages, produce monthly financial reports and attend meetings will not scale to the unit count. Neither will the costs of independent audits or reserve studies. This can apply to capital projects as well. A 3-story high rise and a 10-story high rise could have the same building footprint, meaning that the cost to replace their respective roofs may be about the same. Bottom line: Inevitably, unit owners in small condominiums are very likely to pay more per unit in total fees than their counterparts in larger condominium associations.

As a result, boards of smaller associations frequently opt for less service, requiring investment in the time and knowledge base of volunteers to make up the difference. That burden can be very difficult for volunteers.

There may be solutions that require some creative thinking. While I applaud the resourcefulness and sense of duty shown by the board member who co-mingled personal and association finances, I pray he never gets in a beef with a fellow unit owner. That association clearly did not have any crime coverage. I doubt they had proper directors & officers liability coverage, either. Not all creative ideas are great ideas.

What Can We Do?

The goal is to identify the needs and wants of the board and membership, and then design a plan that is in harmony with them. It is a mistake to assume that small associations can’t afford “good” service. Such thinking is a variation on the sin of fee targeting. Many a community has found that a cheap price results in a high cost later on. Whether it comes in the form of making up for deferred maintenance, the bottom dropping out of resale values, disengaged unit owners, or dissatisfied residents, sooner or later everyone bears the cost of short-term thinking.

Analyzing the Operation

A Responsibility Grid is an excellent tool to help see where you are and where you have gaps. First, list the tasks involved in operating the association along the left margin to create rows. Then, along the top of the page, create columns by listing the volunteers and paid personnel or contracted parties who have roles in the operation. A sample grid you can use can be found HERE.

Once the tasks and responsible parties have been listed, fill in the grid boxes, describing each party’s current role in each task. Soon, you will have a snapshot of the operation, seeing the interrelation of the parties involved. This frequently leads to Aha! moments. We’ve noticed that many Boards have a tendency to assume most issues are performance problems. The Grid helps to reveal weaknesses in the system, allowing everyone to differentiate system problems from performance problems. The Grid may point out that someone else in the organization is better suited to take on a certain responsibility. Or you may find that some tasks aren’t being performed at all under the current system. Once clarified, performance issues can be more effectively addressed.

The trick is to use the Grid to address system problems by making adjustments. The context of seeing the operation in totality helps the board to identify areas where more support is needed. You can redline the grid until it makes sense. It takes the guesswork out of the picture, communicates responsibilities with clarity, and increases the likelihood of finding successful solutions. The final grid can then be a tool to adjust contracted specifications and position descriptions as needed.

What Are The Options?

Many contracts are designed to be “competitive” without regard to the actual workload required for the job. Standard “full service” management may not provide the required attention needed to support volunteers in your specific case. Some approaches to bridge the gaps include:

  • Customizing the management agreement to provide more attention in specific areas. Quantify time and attention where possible. If a minimum weekly site visit and monthly or quarterly property inspection with written report will address many of the issues a community is experiencing, include those as specifications in the management contract. Set the expectation and create a system that takes some of the burden off the shoulders of volunteer leaders. It may be that some specifications can be decreased to help compensate for additional cost, such as decreasing the number of board meetings attended.
  • Decrease the management contract to “financial-only” or “financial-plus” service levels to free up assets and redirect them to on-site management. This is where it gets creative. I cut my management teeth as a part-time on-site manager for five different associations over the span of ten years. Two of them had fewer than 50 units. All of them had something in common. They were all too small to justify full-time, on-site management, but too busy to be well-served by off-site management.
  • Adjust the scope of the management contract to dedicate a specific allowance of time. If the management company is willing to consider an out-of-the-box option, they could provide more attention by defining a number of hours per week for dedicated attention, including on-site time. Some management companies in the northwest use this model.
  • It takes a village. Depending on the configuration and condition of the property, a combination of services might make sense. Perhaps the volunteer base is strong, and you can engage management on an a la carte basis to provide only the services needed when you need them. Perhaps you just need a management company or consultant to set up the annual calendar and preventive maintenance programs and come back to audit the system periodically. Perhaps a maintenance position can be beefed up with a system to provide valuable eyes, ears, arms and legs for Management and the Board. Perhaps strategically scheduling a contracted annual architectural and engineering inspection to coincide with the annual budget process combined with “financial-only” professional management gives the association the best bang for the buck. The possibilities are endless.

In the End

The quality of volunteer leadership will always be vital to the success of any condominium association. The smaller the association, the more important this is. Smaller associations have special challenges. Even volunteer leaders who have the time and talent to assume certain management roles are wise to seek resources to set up systems and find best practices. National organizations like the Community Associations Institute  and the National Association of Housing Cooperatives can be very valuable resources. Associations in the Washington Metro area can tap into additional resources such as the DC Cooperative Housing Coalition, the Montgomery County Office of Common Ownership Communities, and the Office of the Virginia Common Interest Commission Ombudsman 
Small associations may have special challenges. But they don’t have to give up, and they don’t have to settle. There are resources and options for volunteer leaders to provide quality service to their members. It may take some creativity and a realistic view of the expenses related to inequity of scale, but it can be done.

business life, community associations, Culture, Human Resources, leadership, Management

Do You Want To Keep Good People? Build an Intentional Culture

Leave a comment

Turnover is Expensive!

The struggle to attract and keep talented employees and volunteers is universal. For businesses, the hard cost of employee turnover includes hiring and onboarding, initial training, ongoing development, and integration with the team. Finally, it includes the interim costs incurred while a position is unfilled. Yet, soft costs can be far more impactful. Turnover loads a burden on the backs of everyone in a company. These can turn into hard costs with loss of business due to poor performance.

Not-for-profit community associations have different metrics. On-site staff and volunteer turnover result in soft costs such as service gaps and overburdened remaining staff and volunteers. This, in turn, takes a toll on member satisfaction. Increased stress and pressure result. Over time, this can lead to increased turnover and lack of volunteer interest.

Another common and insidious cost of turnover can be an intentional or unintentional lack of investment in employees and volunteers, which inevitably leads to more turnover.

The vicious cycle of churn is costly. And it sucks – it sucks the life out of organizations of every sort.

Strategies

There are plenty of strategies out there to retain employees and volunteers. Google the subject and you’ll find scads of them. They range from simple recognition to the adoption of lofty ideals designed to motivate the troops. Volunteer retainage is its own animal because compensation is defined differently. In all cases, strategies are focused on showing appreciation and providing benefits that are designed to reward people and keep them in the fold. And they might not work.

Don’t get me wrong, many strategies can be beneficial. They may help keep some folks around for a while. But they cannot stand alone. Strategies need to be part of a broader context to have lasting value.

Want Retention? Engage

Retention is a useful metric, but it’s not a goal. It’s a byproduct. According to a 2018 Gallup poll, 53% of U.S. workers are not engaged. Gallup states, “They may be generally satisfied but are not cognitively and emotionally connected to their work and workplace; they will usually show up to work and do the minimum required but will quickly leave their company for a slightly better offer.” Another 13% were reported to be “actively disengaged.” Let that sink in. Two-thirds of American workers spend a significant part of their waking hours at a job they don’t really want to do. Yikes! If they don’t leave, they should.

In their seminal work The Leadership Challenge, Kouzes & Posner conclude that people tend to look at their jobs in one of 3 ways; as a job, as a career, or as a calling. The difference? Engagement. The higher the level of the synchronization between the work someone does and their values and goals, the deeper the engagement.

Want Engagement? Lead

“Engagement is not an HR issue. It is a leadership issue” – Simon Sinek, Author & Organizational Consultant

If the key to engagement is the connection of values and work, it begs a couple of questions. What does your organization stand for? What deeper connection does it offer? This is where many leaders fail. Kouzes and Posner offer an approach to address this. They boil it down to what they call “The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership:”

  • Model the Way
  • Inspire a Shared Vision
  • Challenge the Process
  • Enable Others to Act
  • Encourage the Heart

All five practices directly impact engagement. Leaders who are hypocritical, directionless, non-communicative, myopic, micromanagers with low EQ  kill engagement. If there is a serious weakness in just one or two of these areas, you can count on good people walking out the door.

So then, effective leadership begets engagement and provides a context for strategy. Putting this all together, what are the leaders charged with doing? They must develop and nurture organizational culture.

Build an Intentional Culture – Defining the Organizational “We”

Culture is who we are, proven by what we repeatedly do. Its engine is the shared values of the organization. Shared values lead to aspirational vision. The vision drives goals, which sets the mission. Goals and mission drive strategies, which then dictate day-to-day tactics. We do what we do because we are who we are.

All organizations have a culture. Leaders are responsible for making it an intentional one. That includes community association volunteer leaders. It’s not easy, but it is always worth it. Leaving it to chance leads to disconnected strategies and tactics. And churn.

“Culture eats strategy for breakfast” – Peter Drucker, Legendary Management Educator

As the stewards of intentional culture, leaders must make sure that what we do stays in line with who we are. They must walk the talk. Disconnects must be addressed. Few things cause disengagement more quickly than an organization that espouses values that are violated in the way things are done. A dedication to a values-driven culture draws like-minded persons and engages them. Engaged people not only tend to stay awhile, but they also draw others who will find a satisfying place in the culture.

“Culture is caught, not taught” – Rolf Crocker, CEO, OMNI Community Management, LLC

But They Won’t Let Me!

What if your boss doesn’t get it? What if you are an on-site manager with a board full of clueless non-leaders that make it difficult for you to lead your staff? What if you work for a soul-crushing CEO? You still create a culture with those within your sphere of influence. In fact, you must…or leave. That will be the subject of another blog.
If a public high school department head can create a pocket of excellence despite deeply entrenched policies and bureaucracy, the odds are good that you can build a culture that makes a difference. Leaders don’t ask permission to lead. They may sometimes have to ask for forgiveness afterward. But results tend to take the heat off.

If You Want Them to Stay, Forget the Fence – Build a Fire

External rewards without engagement are like a fence. Engagement produces internal rewards. If you want to keep people in the fold, stop worrying so much about the fence. Instead, build a fire of culture at the center of the organization. That fire gives team members light so they can see the vision and the warmth of shared values and mission. Create a space where people are drawn and want to stay.

Recommended Study Material:

 

The Leadership Challenge, 5th Edition by James Kouzes & Barry Posner 

The Excellence Dividend, by Tom Peters 

Gung Ho!, by Ken Blanchard & Sheldon Bowles 

The Culture Engine, by S. Chris Edmonds 

And if you are REALLY serious, go to Tom Peters’ website  www.excellencenow.com  for his 50- page “Extreme Humanization/Extreme Employee Engagement PDF 

change management, community associations, condo associations, Cooperatives, Culture, HOAs, leadership

Just Don’t

Leave a comment

Silly Human Tricks

We work/live/hang around with certain people for a while. We have experiences with them. We get to know them. We disagree on a few things. We begin to get annoyed with them. We draw conclusions about their motives. We remember the disagreements.

Here’s where it gets weird.

We strategize to get the results we want, with assumptions about evil intent and ugly history close in our mind and heart. We overstate. We accuse. We blame. They are doing the same thing with us. The disagreements deepen. On the surface, conflicts appear to be about the matter at hand. But just under the water line, the real conflict lurks. We are simultaneously talking about the issues of the day and the distrust of the past. These bi-level communications can last forever. Things bog down. Nothing gets done. History repeats again and again in the vortex of a vicious failure cycle. Dysfunction reigns supreme.

Sound familiar? Congress, anyone?

The pattern can set in with any organization where we silly humans are involved. The more emotionally or physically close the people and the longer the relationship, the more entrenched the pattern. I’ve seen it happen in social circles, in businesses, in families, and yes… in community associations.

Learning How to Break the Cycle

Breaking the failure cycle is not easy, but it’s achievable in most circumstances. It took me a while to appreciate the uniqueness of my career in the community associations field. Since my first on-site management contract, my main, though unstated, role had been to fix broken things and build trust. In the ensuing years, I was thrust into similarly challenging situations. I’m not complaining. The experience turned out to be the best education I could have gotten. It led to me doing most of the consulting for a management company and the formation of Association Bridge.

Here’s what I learned…

Don’t Let the 5 Percenters Rule the Roost

One of our silly human tricks is to focus on the negative. 95% of things might be working well, but we only focus on the 5% of that which makes us unhappy or divides us. Community association leaders and managers will always spend a significant amount of time fixing problems. It’s a big part of their jobs. But that can create a challenge. A constant focus on the 5% makes it hard to see the other 95.

I learned a secret. There is a reason people decide to move into a particular community. There are shared goals, values, and aspirations there. I’ve never worked with a community where its members didn’t have more in common than that which divided them. They just couldn’t see it at first. They were so into the weeds that they could not see the forest. The weeds are where the 5 percenters live and flourish. And yes, that includes those with wildly diverse demographics.

The problems are real. Different opinions are real. But the bigger picture is just as real. Getting out of the weeds of distrust and dysfunction requires elevation.

Get to Higher Ground

There are a few strategies that can help to elevate the discourse and begin to turn failure cycles into success cycles. Here are three of my favorites:

  • Use Affirmative Inquiry:  Identify that which members have in common. Establish shared values and goals. Then apply those to the 5 Percenters. Seeing the bigger picture helps to set a context and changes the game.  
  • Let Data Drive the Discussion: Much conflict comes from what I call “Theoryworld.” Absent reliable data, people will always rely on what they know – their opinions. Do the homework, communicate the data vigorously, and let that drive the discussion.   
  • Fresh Blood: Sometimes new leaders with a fresh perspective can help groups come together. In other cases, a “disinterested third party,” a facilitator with no dog in the fight, can help bridge the gaps.

Trust is almost always the key. Stephen M.R. Covey made an astute observation in his excellent book The Speed of Trust. When trust is present, things happen quickly and cost-effectively. When trust is absent, things take longer and cost more. Who doesn’t want cheap and easy? Getting to higher ground begins the process of melting distrust and creating a culture of trust.

Yeah, Sounds Great, But….

Does this stuff actually work? Here are some real-life examples of “Breaking the Cycle”:

Case Study #1

One association had an incendiary newsletter that torched the board over every decision. They undermined confidence and deepened divisions in the community. After about a month, I realized that its editor was a board member’s wife.

I expanded my “Board Orientation/Tune Up” program into a two-part community leadership program. The community had several committees, including the newsletter committee, which were contributing to the dysfunction to one degree or another. The first session was for all committee members and board members. This was followed a week later by a board-only session. There was a clear communication of both the letter and spirit of the law and governing documents. Both sessions included a section about best practices in leadership. We applied universally accepted principles to the community association paradigm. This created a space where the group could follow up with a productive planning session. They were able to agree on goals for the year and a program to reach them. Two years of progress ensued.

Case Study #2

Another condominium we took over had severely underfunded reserves and an unrealistic budget. They had also been the victim of theft from their prior attorney, who had pocketed the fees provided by members in collections. The stories were heartbreaking. Community members were equally upset about the condition of the property and the prospect of higher condominium fees. I facilitated a town hall meeting to share the difficult news. The Board, worried about a violent reaction, made sure to hire an off-duty police officer to keep me and them from being attacked.

By the end of the presentation with the data clearly shared, we had unit owners offering to organize to perform some repairs and property clean-up as volunteers. Once members saw clearly the reality of their situation, working together to find solutions became the obvious alternative to blame and complaint. Despite the increase in fees and many challenges, there was a palpable improvement in community spirit at the next annual meeting.

Case Study #3

At an annual meeting 16 days into a new management contract, I had a unit owner point her finger at me and tell me she was going to hold me accountable for everything the board did. In the ensuing months, she took full advantage of owner comment periods at board meetings to remind everyone of every bad decision that had been made over the last 30 years and to call into question board members’ intelligence. I got to know her and at one point suggested she consider running for the board to be a part of the solution. She declined. I still remember the look on her face when I told her that at some point the community would need to learn how to agree to disagree in an agreeable fashion. You would have thought I had two heads. After a pregnant pause, she whirled away and exclaimed disgustedly, “That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard!”

After a full analysis of the operation and a particularly vigorous and expanded budget process, the community understood the needs of the building and where their money was going. At the next annual meeting, my finger-pointing friend rose to deliver her usual diatribe, only to be encouraged to cease and desist by her fellow unit owners. Deferred maintenance projects were eventually initiated. The turnaround put this previously notorious community in a position to win a Community Association of the Year award.

The Bottom Line

We spend too much time and energy allowing our opinions get in the way of getting things done. We are missing opportunities that are right in front of us. Imputing the motives of others has no value. Even if you are right, it doesn’t help.

Stop. Just don’t. Find facts and stick with them. Get to higher ground. Focus on strengths. Find the shared values, goals and aspirations. Let that create context and culture. Put people in a position to be their best. And then…watch success happen.

The iconic Sgt. Joe Friday had the right idea…

Best Practices, community associations, Governance, leadership, Meeting Tips

Meeting Tips #5 – Little Things Set a Tone & Help You Get Stuff Done (Part Deux)

Leave a comment

“Excellence is doing ordinary things extraordinarily well.” – John W. Gardner

Nip It in the Bud

One negative person can dominate the tone of a whole room. A proactive approach can be an effective strategy to keep things positive and productive. Arrive early. Before the meeting starts, read body language and other non-verbal cues. Look for members who may have expressed negativity in the past, or those you know have a complaint they want to bring up. It might feel natural to duck and cover, waiting for the meeting to start. To defeat fear of conflict, try approaching the person with a friendly greeting. You might be amazed. Short, personal, respectful and positive interchanges can be a game changer. The person might just tell you what’s on their mind and you will be able to have a productive interchange even before the meeting starts. Taking the initiative in showing respect and civility makes it easier for people, even the unhappy ones, to be at their best and respond in kind. It won’t always work. But if you don’t try it, it definitely won’t work.

Bob’s Got a Point

Some people chafe at the thought of using Robert’s Rules. It might seem overly formal. Some chairpersons seem to use it as a sledgehammer to control people, further giving Ol’ Bob a bad name.

While it makes no sense to employ every detail and nuance included in Robert’s to a small group, there is one process that can make a world of difference. When a board sticks with the basic discipline of making motions, it can save a ton of time and make sure the discussion stays civil and on point. It also emphasizes two key principles that are essential for group decision-making. The will of the majority is done and the minority is heard and has the opportunity to impact the final decision. Too many boards talk their way into a motion and try to get everybody on the same page. I remember one board president, who was a professional grant writer and part-time poet, who wordsmithed every motion on the spot. Approving minutes with an edit could take 20 minutes! Here’s the process that negates talking your way into a motion and the endless and inefficient chatter that goes with it:

  1. Make a specific motion. A board member would like to approve an action.
  2. Second the motion. Another board member agrees the thing is worth considering. If there is no second, there is nothing to talk about. The motion dies. That’s it. Stop talking.
  3. Chair calls for discussion. Only now is discussion initiated, and it is focused on the merits of the motion. Questions are asked and answered. MAYBE a better idea comes up – and if so, the original motion can be amended. If it’s clear the motion seems fatally flawed, it can be withdrawn and replaced by a completely new motion – or not.
  4. Call the question. Once it becomes clear to the chair or other board members that the points have been made, it’s time to vote. If someone objects to calling the question, they should have a brand new point to make.
  5. Vote. A 5-0 vote has the same effect of a 3-2 vote. If board members are respectful and gracious…i.e. good fiduciaries and leaders… the minority will support the decision and set a tone for the community.
  6. Next!

If your meetings are chaotic and directions unclear, give it a try. You might be surprised.

And Finally…

I’ve had a mentor for over 30 years. One of the reasons I’ve stuck with him all these years is “Best Idea Wins” has always been his motto. He stays faithful to the principle, no matter how challenging the people and circumstances have been.

Think about it… a good idea is a good idea. It doesn’t matter who comes up with it. It doesn’t matter how well or poorly the idea might be communicated. Ideas have no ego. Ideas lead to solutions. Committing to Best Idea Wins demonstrates principled leadership, especially when things get complicated and contentious. It creates a space where people can resolve conflicts and be at their best. Try it. You will inspire the same respect that I have for my mentor.

To all the board members and professionals who serve them, I offer this encouragement. Please never forget that when you choose to carry out your responsibilities in an excellent way, you absolutely make a difference in the quality of life of everyone in the communities you serve, sometimes in large ways, sometimes in small ways, whether or not members realize it or not, and whether or not they ever say “thank you.” The only person who can take that truth away from you is you. Please don’t let that happen

So there you have it. Thirty years of meetings boiled down to twenty-six tips over five blogs. Have you found any that work for you that we missed? Let us know!

Best Practices, Communications, community associations, Emotional Intelligence, Governance, leadership, Meeting Tips

Meeting Tips #3 – O Say Can You Hear?

Leave a comment

Community association boards do the bulk of their business at board meetings (or at least, they SHOULD). It can be tough for community members to observe the proceedings and resist the urge to chime in from the audience, especially on hot topics. This happens often with residents who do not understand that community associations are based on the representative democracy model. Yes, the board is ultimately responsible for picking the community center wallpaper…it’s not a community vote…

Wise boards do everything they can to avoid operating in a vacuum. They know they are responsible for making decisions that benefit the membership as a whole. They also learn that group leadership is a messy business. The odds are less than great that everyone will be happy with every decision. Convincing a vocal minority that they have been heard can be tough.

Meetings are an opportunity to build community through listening. Sometimes the format of board meetings can create unintentional landmines in this regard. Here are a few ways to flip the script and make opportunity.

Owner Comment Period

Many state statutes require a period of time be set aside for owners to ask questions and make comments. Even if it might not be required in your location, it’s a terrific provision. There are a few nuances to how a board administrates the comment period that will take full advantage of listening opportunities.

  • Timing: Some communities choose to have a comment period on the agenda before action items to allow for input. Others find that most of the comments and questions are on topics unrelated to the action items and find it more beneficial to put comment periods later in the agenda. I had one client that found it most effective to have two short open forums: the first for input before the board discussed action items, and the second one after, to allow members to bring up items unrelated to action items.

The key is to thoughtfully consider how members can best contribute to the discussion and be heard. Remember – you never know where the next great idea might come from! Be ready to hear it.

  • Following up: A typical refrain from some community association members is that things are discussed at meetings but nothing ever happens. Sometimes the culprit is how the owner comment period is conducted. Some matters are simple management issues that can be addressed on the spot. However, boards are wise not to make decisions on new issues brought up in open forum when they are unprepared. Some boards use the stock phrase, “We will take that under advisement,” but they don’t actually have a system to close the loop. Here are a few tips to help boards listen, which will also give their community members the confidence they actually are:

  1. Take notes while the member is talking to capture the main points.
  2. Ask questions for clarification as needed,
  3. Restate. A great phrase I’ve used is, “So I think I heard…”
  4. Embrace passion. If an owner is upset, they care. There’s energy there. Perhaps there’s an ad hoc committee lurking, just waiting to be formed, that will help the board turn a problem into a solution.
  5. If a matter is worth discussion, add it to new business in the meeting agenda.
  6. Make it clear if a matter is delegated to management, a committee, or a board member.  Who has the ball?
  7. If a matter would require an unbudgeted expense, you can indicate that it might be included in next year’s budget discussion and direct that it be added to the budget file. Just make sure it’s included in the first draft, (a.k.a. “the kitchen sink version” – for more on that concept, CLICK HERE) of the budget, no matter how wacky the idea might seem.
  8. Make sure the manager or another party is responsible for producing a meeting task list. The list should include not only the follow-up items from motions, but also all the little details noted above that would get lost otherwise.

Hint: If owners are using valuable meeting time to bring up day-to-day management issues, it may be a sign your processes are not clear. Asking a member if they have reported the matter to management is an appropriate response. If they have, but believe the response was inadequate, you can let them know you appreciate the report and will help to connect the dots between the owner and management. If they have not, it’s a golden opportunity. Listen to the report, then let them know management will take care of it. Then remind them that in the future, they need not wait for board meetings to make requests. That message reinforces the association’s service procedures and helps all participants understand the best way to be heard in such matters.

Recognition

Don’t forget to thank volunteers and managers for their efforts. Thank members for their comments. Recognize good questions. If a member discussed a problem, show empathy for the member even if they were a part of the problem. Practicing recognition promotes active listening and demonstrates the emotional intelligence that helps members know they have been heard.

Hot Topics

Some disagree with me, but I’ve always recommended that those chairing meetings open the floor for specific comments on particularly contentious issues to allow members to express themselves. This uncommon action of adding impromptu comment periods proves the board is serious about member input. You can still set a time limit to keep things going. You can also request that if someone else had already made a point a member wishes to make, that they make a simple statement of agreement and do not make repetitive points.

Is This the Right Meeting?

Board meetings are designed to conduct business. If the member comment period is taking over the meeting, the community is telling you something. You have bigger issues to address. When board meetings become free-for-alls, it has become a de facto “town hall” meeting. It also may be telling you the community is deep in the weeds and needs to take a step back and do some serious planning. Board meetings are great for doing the basic business of the community. But they are lousy for town hall meetings and for strategic planning.

Town hall meetings are great for either collecting or disseminating information. No business is done, just communication. It amazes me that most community associations never have a yearly planning session soon after annual meetings to discuss the goals for the upcoming board year. If the community needs to hire an outside facilitator to help plan and conduct town hall or strategic planning meetings, it can be well worth the investment.

Carpe Momentum

Meetings are opportunities to lead, to connect, and to build community. Listening is at the heart of all three. Why not seize the moment?

change management, community associations, condo associations, Cooperatives, Emotional Intelligence, HOAs, leadership, Management

Let the Data Drive the Discussion

Leave a comment

Change is hard.  New is hard.  Fear makes bad news hard to take.  Is it any wonder that from time to time community association managers, advisors and volunteer leaders find themselves at odds with community members or each other?  Sooner or later, they all will find themselves duty bound to share a message someone won’t want to hear.

Money Hurts

This happens a lot when money is involved.  People hate to spend money especially when they cannot see the value of the expense.  Here’s where community associations remind members of the government, either consciously or subconsciously.  I recall hearing a quote from the Wall Street Journal along the lines of, “People have the same warm emotional connection to their homeowners association as they do the Internal Revenue Service.”  Ouch!

Drill down a little and it makes sense.  Citizens expect infrastructure and services, but they may chafe at paying the taxes that make them possible.  Why?  In a word, trust.  Governments, with their inevitable bureaucracies, have complicated, enormous budgets that the average citizen cannot comprehend.  This makes it difficult, if not impossible, to tell how well utilized those taxes are.  The end result?  Distrust and an assumption of waste…or worse.  Association Fees are a community association’s tax.  If members are not clear that their money is being spent wisely, it’s tough to take.  Members may well default to their assumptions of waste…or worse.

See The Enemy

If you are going to ask for higher fees, spend a wad of cash, or change anything people are familiar with, you need to be ready to explain why.  You may need to combat distrust.  Fortunately, this is much easier to accomplish on the micro level of a community association than is it for the Federal Government!  The information might be somewhat complicated, but it can be available and explainable.

If the direction is sound, it’s based on sound data.  But members may not be aware of the data they need to trust the messenger.  And until the messenger is trusted, the message is lost.

There are two insidious enemies that can erode the trust of your members:

  1. The Law of Omitted Data: The concept is that if a person has some knowledge about a subject but does not have all the facts, it is likely that person’s degree of misunderstanding will grow exponentially over time.  The impact of the law can be devastating in the group dynamic, especially when the Telephone Game factor gets added to the mix.  I’ve seen this blow communities apart.
  1. Theoryworld: The absence of experience or real life information doesn’t stop people from trying to be experts. We imagine scenarios and responses and all kinds of possible permutations and combinations of things that might happen.  Discussion and arguments in Theoryworld last for-EV-er!  They have an annoying tendency to bear little resemblance to reality and waste valuable time and energy.  Theoryworld is exhausting and leads to regrettable decisions.

When data is bad or missing, misinformed opinions and fear can set in and emotions can run high.  It gets personal.  People mistakenly see each other as the enemy.  The real enemies, the Law of Omitted Data and Theoryworld, are hiding just under the surface.

How can you vanquish these enemies?  How can you fill in the blanks and bridge the gap between theory and reality?  How can your group make good decisions and actually get things done?

Fight the Real Enemies

Your first reaction to manifestations of the Law of Omitted Data or Theoryworld may be to correct or defend.  Don’t.  That adds fuel to the ego-driven fire, even if you are 100% right.  Rather than counteracting bad data, seek to fill in the gaps of understanding with good data.  Your goal isn’t to win an argument.  Ego is a major part of the problem.  Elevate the dialogue from ego-based to principle-based– from emotional opinion-based to fact-based.  In so doing, you create a space in which the data can drive the discussion.

The presentation of the data requires more than logic.  It means acknowledging ego and emotion, both yours and others’.  This is another real life scenario where gobs of emotional intelligence will make a massive difference.   Here are a few strategies to get there:

  • Find trustable outside experts. A message from a disinterested third-party can have an impact.  Share their information or let them do the talking.
  • Show and tell. A picture really does paint a thousand words.  And seeing it up close and personal makes things real.  Cruddy pipes, scary boiler rooms, a mudslide behind the pool.  You don’t have to sell it.  Just allow people to see reality.
  • Show your work like doing arithmetic in the third grade. Even if the level of detail seems excessive, the fact that the research was done and you are willing to show your process can build bridges and confidence.
  • Conversely, make it clear the presentation of detailed data isn’t a snow job. Bullet point summaries, charts and graphs– anything that aids visualization is good.  The supporting materials can be in the back.
  • Accept all options and ideas at first, even if every bone in your body tells you they never work. Instead of saying “no” up front, let the group decision making process say “no.”
  • Try to use more questions than declarative statements

Hail Victory!

Don’t worry about making a case.  Create a space where the case makes itself.  Trust the process.  Be patient – time will tell the truth.  Let the data drive the discussion.

What strategies have you used to defeat the Law of Omitted Data and Theoryworld?