Management Insider #2 provided a historical analysis of the current state of affairs. Armed with that knowledge and a deeper understanding of underlying issues, we are in a position to move towards solutions. Trust and perception of value are at the core of the downward press on management fees. Creating spaces where these two factors become strengths in the management-board relationship gets everyone off the hamster wheel of dissatisfaction.
There are no easy answers. Not every approach works in every situation. And there will be boards and management companies that don’t get it and never will. That’s OK. This blog is not for them.

• System vs. Performance: I learned long ago that most boards assume that management problems are performance issues. Unless I figured out whether issues were actually a performance issue, a systems issue, or a combination of the two, everyone was asking and answering the wrong questions. The analysis must be case-specific. Every community is different. Dig deep into needs and expectations, and compare that reality to the resources in place to meet them. The right system with metrics and accountability puts people in a position to succeed. Outstanding performance can mask deficient systems. Management companies must resist the urge to tell clients they will take care of everything without fully appreciating the implication. Overpromising and oversimplification serve no one in the long run.
• Enough with the Price Per Door Already: Management fees per unit per month are somewhat helpful to gauge costs, but it is an incomplete metric. Unit count can have little correlation with the work required to manage a community. Age of structure, type of construction, logistics, reserve funding, deferred maintenance, neighborhoods, internal demographics, and expectation for service will all play a part in the system and performance required to manage a community. I am floored when I hear of management companies who provide pricing without so much as a site visit, a meeting with a board, or a review of documents. Estimate the workload. Price it accordingly. A cookie-cutter approach can work for some clients. But without some analysis, there’s an awful lot left up to chance. Management companies that can explain the rationale behind their pricing and system set the table to earn respect and trust.
• Value the Work: Set price contracts must assume a certain workload. Boards can have the unrealistic expectation that no matter what happens, the monthly management fee should cover it. That makes zero sense. Managers, fearing the wrath of their clients, are sometimes either unaware of contract terms or nervous about charging for extra work. Until those work hours and efforts are acknowledged, a manager’s time is not likely to be respected. Communicate in advance, explain the business model, agree to terms as needed, and change when appropriate.
• Migrate Management On Site: A common complaint about portfolio managers is that they do not spend enough time or attention to their clients. This may be a system problem. Twenty-six years ago, my mentor Arthur Dubin advocated bringing management on site in an article for the Journal of Property Management. He said, “A growing number of condominium associations are choosing on-site management better serve the needs of the owners, residents, and boards of directors. This reallocation of resources has often proved successful in both cost efficiency and quality of service.” A quarter of a century of experience has proven him right. Boots on the ground and brains on site can be the most effective allocation of resources in many circumstances. Some creativity may be required. Even if the shift means association payroll increases while management fees decrease, everyone wins in the long run. Lower fees that result in higher total profits over several years with a happy client beat higher profits from unhappy clients that fire you after two years every time.

Those are just a few perspectives and strategies to help both boards and management win. If a community has a pattern of dissatisfaction, there’s a reason. Dig a little deeper. Challenge your assumptions. Let’s begin to get off the hamster wheel.