Category Archives: community associations

Do You Want To Keep Good People? Build an Intentional Culture

Turnover is Expensive!

The struggle to attract and keep talented employees and volunteers is universal. For businesses, the hard cost of employee turnover includes hiring and onboarding, initial training, ongoing development, and integration with the team. Finally, it includes the interim costs incurred while a position is unfilled. Yet, soft costs can be far more impactful. Turnover loads a burden on the backs of everyone in a company. These can turn into hard costs with loss of business due to poor performance.

Not-for-profit community associations have different metrics. On-site staff and volunteer turnover result in soft costs such as service gaps and overburdened remaining staff and volunteers. This, in turn, takes a toll on member satisfaction. Increased stress and pressure result. Over time, this can lead to increased turnover and lack of volunteer interest.

Another common and insidious cost of turnover can be an intentional or unintentional lack of investment in employees and volunteers, which inevitably leads to more turnover.

The vicious cycle of churn is costly. And it sucks – it sucks the life out of organizations of every sort.

Strategies

There are plenty of strategies out there to retain employees and volunteers. Google the subject and you’ll find scads of them. They range from simple recognition to the adoption of lofty ideals designed to motivate the troops. Volunteer retainage is its own animal because compensation is defined differently. In all cases, strategies are focused on showing appreciation and providing benefits that are designed to reward people and keep them in the fold. And they might not work.

Don’t get me wrong, many strategies can be beneficial. They may help keep some folks around for a while. But they cannot stand alone. Strategies need to be part of a broader context to have lasting value.

Want Retention? Engage

Retention is a useful metric, but it’s not a goal. It’s a byproduct. According to a 2018 Gallup poll, 53% of U.S. workers are not engaged. Gallup states, “They may be generally satisfied but are not cognitively and emotionally connected to their work and workplace; they will usually show up to work and do the minimum required but will quickly leave their company for a slightly better offer.” Another 13% were reported to be “actively disengaged.” Let that sink in. Two-thirds of American workers spend a significant part of their waking hours at a job they don’t really want to do. Yikes! If they don’t leave, they should.

In their seminal work The Leadership Challenge, Kouzes & Posner conclude that people tend to look at their jobs in one of 3 ways; as a job, as a career, or as a calling. The difference? Engagement. The higher the level of the synchronization between the work someone does and their values and goals, the deeper the engagement.

Want Engagement? Lead

“Engagement is not an HR issue. It is a leadership issue” – Simon Sinek, Author & Organizational Consultant

If the key to engagement is the connection of values and work, it begs a couple of questions. What does your organization stand for? What deeper connection does it offer? This is where many leaders fail. Kouzes and Posner offer an approach to address this. They boil it down to what they call “The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership:”

  • Model the Way
  • Inspire a Shared Vision
  • Challenge the Process
  • Enable Others to Act
  • Encourage the Heart

All five practices directly impact engagement. Leaders who are hypocritical, directionless, non-communicative, myopic, micromanagers with low EQ  kill engagement. If there is a serious weakness in just one or two of these areas, you can count on good people walking out the door.

So then, effective leadership begets engagement and provides a context for strategy. Putting this all together, what are the leaders charged with doing? They must develop and nurture organizational culture.

Build an Intentional Culture – Defining the Organizational “We”

Culture is who we are, proven by what we repeatedly do. Its engine is the shared values of the organization. Shared values lead to aspirational vision. The vision drives goals, which sets the mission. Goals and mission drive strategies, which then dictate day-to-day tactics. We do what we do because we are who we are.

All organizations have a culture. Leaders are responsible for making it an intentional one. That includes community association volunteer leaders. It’s not easy, but it is always worth it. Leaving it to chance leads to disconnected strategies and tactics. And churn.

“Culture eats strategy for breakfast” – Peter Drucker, Legendary Management Educator

As the stewards of intentional culture, leaders must make sure that what we do stays in line with who we are. They must walk the talk. Disconnects must be addressed. Few things cause disengagement more quickly than an organization that espouses values that are violated in the way things are done. A dedication to a values-driven culture draws like-minded persons and engages them. Engaged people not only tend to stay awhile, but they also draw others who will find a satisfying place in the culture.

“Culture is caught, not taught” – Rolf Crocker, CEO, OMNI Community Management, LLC

But They Won’t Let Me!

What if your boss doesn’t get it? What if you are an on-site manager with a board full of clueless non-leaders that make it difficult for you to lead your staff? What if you work for a soul-crushing CEO? You still create a culture with those within your sphere of influence. In fact, you must…or leave. That will be the subject of another blog.
If a public high school department head can create a pocket of excellence despite deeply entrenched policies and bureaucracy, the odds are good that you can build a culture that makes a difference. Leaders don’t ask permission to lead. They may sometimes have to ask for forgiveness afterward. But results tend to take the heat off.

If You Want Them to Stay, Forget the Fence – Build a Fire

External rewards without engagement are like a fence. Engagement produces internal rewards. If you want to keep people in the fold, stop worrying so much about the fence. Instead, build a fire of culture at the center of the organization. That fire gives team members light so they can see the vision and the warmth of shared values and mission. Create a space where people are drawn and want to stay.

Recommended Study Material:

 

The Leadership Challenge, 5th Edition by James Kouzes & Barry Posner 

The Excellence Dividend, by Tom Peters 

Gung Ho!, by Ken Blanchard & Sheldon Bowles 

The Culture Engine, by S. Chris Edmonds 

And if you are REALLY serious, go to Tom Peters’ website  www.excellencenow.com  for his 50- page “Extreme Humanization/Extreme Employee Engagement PDF 

Nobody Trusts Herb Tarlek – Advice for Professionals Serving Community Associations

How We Got Here

If you were to read governing documents for community associations written in the days of old (OK…the 70s), you might well get the idea there was a vision that volunteer homeowners would gladly offer themselves up to lead and manage their communities. The assumption seemed to be that communities would be full of willing, qualified and able owners ready to handle all the business of running the not-for-profit organization. Little did anyone envision the legal and technical challenges that would become part of the effort, much less the time that would be required.

Nearly half a century later, reality has set in. Volunteer leaders need professionals to some extent if they are to serve and protect the interests of their members. Regulation, emerging and ever-changing law, technical expertise, and available time are all factors. Yet, it is well known in the business community that serving community associations can be tough. It is a specialty niche, and professionals working in the space understand that. They know that, as compared to working in other forms of real estate such as residential, rental and commercial, it takes more time to get things done, usually at a lower profit margin.

But community members don’t always recognize this. It’s money out of their pockets, so of course, they want to watch their costs. A DIY, price-only, bottom line mentality can significantly influence financial decisions. The true cost isn’t always recognized….until after the lawsuit…or the third time something has to be fixed….or community spirit goes south….or the special assessment hits…Suddenly the cost of quality professional service and advice doesn’t seem so high after all.

It is very easy to chalk this thought pattern up to the prototypical penny-pinching board. But the issue may be deeper. Boards of directors may fail to discern the difference between up-front price and long-term cost, between investment and expense. It may be a lack of vision and the inability to perceive value.

The Issue is TRUST

Typically, there are many missed opportunities to build trust and provide value to association members. Vision, communication, and leadership are the keys to the perception of value. And a key component of recognizing value is trust.

A challenge for professionals serving community associations is your clients might not fully trust you. Consciously or subconsciously, you might be Herb Tarlek to them.

Yes, Herb Tarlek, the occasionally abrasive, egotistical & self-absorbed salesman from the old sitcom WKRP in Cincinnati. He isn’t trusted, not only for his godawful sports jackets but because it is crystal clear he’s in it for himself. His approach is selfish and transactional. Sadly, attorneys and consultants are sometimes perceived in a similar way. Some clients feel your primary goal is creating opportunities for billable hours. The research you do in providing opinions can look like billable busywork to them. When management companies highlight the value of their services it might seem like manipulative self-promotion.

Some community association lawyers and management companies have a knack for building trust and proving value. As a consultant, I am viewed similarly, so I’ve been happy to apply the following concepts I’ve learned from these exceptional community association professionals.

  • Ask More Questions: Lawyers who listen build partnerships. Those who ask questions get buy-in. Socratic training has benefits that transcend depositions and courtrooms.
  • Simplify the Message: Ego will not permit many clients from admitting they do not understand what their lawyers are communicating. Many lawyers don’t help themselves by communicating strictly from their training and perspective, forgetting that communication is supposed to benefit the client. The old W.C. Fields quote works against you: “If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with [BS].” The more words you use, the more likely you’ll be perceived as the self-absorbed, egotistical Herb, trying to sell them a justification for the fees you are charging. Using plain English summaries, FAQ format and other tools can help to make the communication palatable and trustworthy.
  • Use Humor: A little levity at the right time can build rapport and show clients there is a human behind the suit. So long as it’s genuine and you actually HAVE a sense of humor.
  • Give a Little Away: There is great power in the zero invoice. Choosing a moment where you can give a client a break can make a significant impression. An $800 invoice detailing all the time and activity followed by an $800 courtesy discount shows value. It shows the client it’s not all about fees, and that the relationship is appreciated. I’ve also heard clients recount with appreciation conversations with attorneys noting, “He was nice enough to tell me he was turning the clock off during our conversation.”
  • Give a Little Away (Part 2): Some law firms and management companies offer board training as part of their agreement. As soon as one is perceived as a consultant providing value, they are less likely to be perceived as a self-promoting salesman.
THE TAKEAWAYS …

  • Value begets trust, trust creates value.
  • Think relational, not transactional.
  • If you focus on billable hours or self-promotion, you may have an average client for a while. If you focus on giving value, you are more likely to have a great client for a long time.
  • Think and communicate from the client’s perspective. Always.

Just Don’t

Silly Human Tricks

We work/live/hang around with certain people for a while. We have experiences with them. We get to know them. We disagree on a few things. We begin to get annoyed with them. We draw conclusions about their motives. We remember the disagreements.

Here’s where it gets weird.

We strategize to get the results we want, with assumptions about evil intent and ugly history close in our mind and heart. We overstate. We accuse. We blame. They are doing the same thing with us. The disagreements deepen. On the surface, conflicts appear to be about the matter at hand. But just under the water line, the real conflict lurks. We are simultaneously talking about the issues of the day and the distrust of the past. These bi-level communications can last forever. Things bog down. Nothing gets done. History repeats again and again in the vortex of a vicious failure cycle. Dysfunction reigns supreme.

Sound familiar? Congress, anyone?

The pattern can set in with any organization where we silly humans are involved. The more emotionally or physically close the people and the longer the relationship, the more entrenched the pattern. I’ve seen it happen in social circles, in businesses, in families, and yes… in community associations.

Learning How to Break the Cycle

Breaking the failure cycle is not easy, but it’s achievable in most circumstances. It took me a while to appreciate the uniqueness of my career in the community associations field. Since my first on-site management contract, my main, though unstated, role had been to fix broken things and build trust. In the ensuing years, I was thrust into similarly challenging situations. I’m not complaining. The experience turned out to be the best education I could have gotten. It led to me doing most of the consulting for a management company and the formation of Association Bridge.

Here’s what I learned…

Don’t Let the 5 Percenters Rule the Roost

One of our silly human tricks is to focus on the negative. 95% of things might be working well, but we only focus on the 5% of that which makes us unhappy or divides us. Community association leaders and managers will always spend a significant amount of time fixing problems. It’s a big part of their jobs. But that can create a challenge. A constant focus on the 5% makes it hard to see the other 95.

I learned a secret. There is a reason people decide to move into a particular community. There are shared goals, values, and aspirations there. I’ve never worked with a community where its members didn’t have more in common than that which divided them. They just couldn’t see it at first. They were so into the weeds that they could not see the forest. The weeds are where the 5 percenters live and flourish. And yes, that includes those with wildly diverse demographics.

The problems are real. Different opinions are real. But the bigger picture is just as real. Getting out of the weeds of distrust and dysfunction requires elevation.

Get to Higher Ground

There are a few strategies that can help to elevate the discourse and begin to turn failure cycles into success cycles. Here are three of my favorites:

  • Use Affirmative Inquiry:  Identify that which members have in common. Establish shared values and goals. Then apply those to the 5 Percenters. Seeing the bigger picture helps to set a context and changes the game.  
  • Let Data Drive the Discussion: Much conflict comes from what I call “Theoryworld.” Absent reliable data, people will always rely on what they know – their opinions. Do the homework, communicate the data vigorously, and let that drive the discussion.   
  • Fresh Blood: Sometimes new leaders with a fresh perspective can help groups come together. In other cases, a “disinterested third party,” a facilitator with no dog in the fight, can help bridge the gaps.

Trust is almost always the key. Stephen M.R. Covey made an astute observation in his excellent book The Speed of Trust. When trust is present, things happen quickly and cost-effectively. When trust is absent, things take longer and cost more. Who doesn’t want cheap and easy? Getting to higher ground begins the process of melting distrust and creating a culture of trust.

Yeah, Sounds Great, But….

Does this stuff actually work? Here are some real-life examples of “Breaking the Cycle”:

Case Study #1

One association had an incendiary newsletter that torched the board over every decision. They undermined confidence and deepened divisions in the community. After about a month, I realized that its editor was a board member’s wife.

I expanded my “Board Orientation/Tune Up” program into a two-part community leadership program. The community had several committees, including the newsletter committee, which were contributing to the dysfunction to one degree or another. The first session was for all committee members and board members. This was followed a week later by a board-only session. There was a clear communication of both the letter and spirit of the law and governing documents. Both sessions included a section about best practices in leadership. We applied universally accepted principles to the community association paradigm. This created a space where the group could follow up with a productive planning session. They were able to agree on goals for the year and a program to reach them. Two years of progress ensued.

Case Study #2

Another condominium we took over had severely underfunded reserves and an unrealistic budget. They had also been the victim of theft from their prior attorney, who had pocketed the fees provided by members in collections. The stories were heartbreaking. Community members were equally upset about the condition of the property and the prospect of higher condominium fees. I facilitated a town hall meeting to share the difficult news. The Board, worried about a violent reaction, made sure to hire an off-duty police officer to keep me and them from being attacked.

By the end of the presentation with the data clearly shared, we had unit owners offering to organize to perform some repairs and property clean-up as volunteers. Once members saw clearly the reality of their situation, working together to find solutions became the obvious alternative to blame and complaint. Despite the increase in fees and many challenges, there was a palpable improvement in community spirit at the next annual meeting.

Case Study #3

At an annual meeting 16 days into a new management contract, I had a unit owner point her finger at me and tell me she was going to hold me accountable for everything the board did. In the ensuing months, she took full advantage of owner comment periods at board meetings to remind everyone of every bad decision that had been made over the last 30 years and to call into question board members’ intelligence. I got to know her and at one point suggested she consider running for the board to be a part of the solution. She declined. I still remember the look on her face when I told her that at some point the community would need to learn how to agree to disagree in an agreeable fashion. You would have thought I had two heads. After a pregnant pause, she whirled away and exclaimed disgustedly, “That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard!”

After a full analysis of the operation and a particularly vigorous and expanded budget process, the community understood the needs of the building and where their money was going. At the next annual meeting, my finger-pointing friend rose to deliver her usual diatribe, only to be encouraged to cease and desist by her fellow unit owners. Deferred maintenance projects were eventually initiated. The turnaround put this previously notorious community in a position to win a Community Association of the Year award.

The Bottom Line

We spend too much time and energy allowing our opinions get in the way of getting things done. We are missing opportunities that are right in front of us. Imputing the motives of others has no value. Even if you are right, it doesn’t help.

Stop. Just don’t. Find facts and stick with them. Get to higher ground. Focus on strengths. Find the shared values, goals and aspirations. Let that create context and culture. Put people in a position to be their best. And then…watch success happen.

The iconic Sgt. Joe Friday had the right idea…

Meeting Tips #5 – Little Things Set a Tone & Help You Get Stuff Done (Part Deux)

“Excellence is doing ordinary things extraordinarily well.” – John W. Gardner

Nip It in the Bud

One negative person can dominate the tone of a whole room. A proactive approach can be an effective strategy to keep things positive and productive. Arrive early. Before the meeting starts, read body language and other non-verbal cues. Look for members who may have expressed negativity in the past, or those you know have a complaint they want to bring up. It might feel natural to duck and cover, waiting for the meeting to start. To defeat fear of conflict, try approaching the person with a friendly greeting. You might be amazed. Short, personal, respectful and positive interchanges can be a game changer. The person might just tell you what’s on their mind and you will be able to have a productive interchange even before the meeting starts. Taking the initiative in showing respect and civility makes it easier for people, even the unhappy ones, to be at their best and respond in kind. It won’t always work. But if you don’t try it, it definitely won’t work.

Bob’s Got a Point

Some people chafe at the thought of using Robert’s Rules. It might seem overly formal. Some chairpersons seem to use it as a sledgehammer to control people, further giving Ol’ Bob a bad name.

While it makes no sense to employ every detail and nuance included in Robert’s to a small group, there is one process that can make a world of difference. When a board sticks with the basic discipline of making motions, it can save a ton of time and make sure the discussion stays civil and on point. It also emphasizes two key principles that are essential for group decision-making. The will of the majority is done and the minority is heard and has the opportunity to impact the final decision. Too many boards talk their way into a motion and try to get everybody on the same page. I remember one board president, who was a professional grant writer and part-time poet, who wordsmithed every motion on the spot. Approving minutes with an edit could take 20 minutes! Here’s the process that negates talking your way into a motion and the endless and inefficient chatter that goes with it:

  1. Make a specific motion. A board member would like to approve an action.
  2. Second the motion. Another board member agrees the thing is worth considering. If there is no second, there is nothing to talk about. The motion dies. That’s it. Stop talking.
  3. Chair calls for discussion. Only now is discussion initiated, and it is focused on the merits of the motion. Questions are asked and answered. MAYBE a better idea comes up – and if so, the original motion can be amended. If it’s clear the motion seems fatally flawed, it can be withdrawn and replaced by a completely new motion – or not.
  4. Call the question. Once it becomes clear to the chair or other board members that the points have been made, it’s time to vote. If someone objects to calling the question, they should have a brand new point to make.
  5. Vote. A 5-0 vote has the same effect of a 3-2 vote. If board members are respectful and gracious…i.e. good fiduciaries and leaders… the minority will support the decision and set a tone for the community.
  6. Next!

If your meetings are chaotic and directions unclear, give it a try. You might be surprised.

And Finally…

I’ve had a mentor for over 30 years. One of the reasons I’ve stuck with him all these years is “Best Idea Wins” has always been his motto. He stays faithful to the principle, no matter how challenging the people and circumstances have been.

Think about it… a good idea is a good idea. It doesn’t matter who comes up with it. It doesn’t matter how well or poorly the idea might be communicated. Ideas have no ego. Ideas lead to solutions. Committing to Best Idea Wins demonstrates principled leadership, especially when things get complicated and contentious. It creates a space where people can resolve conflicts and be at their best. Try it. You will inspire the same respect that I have for my mentor.

To all the board members and professionals who serve them, I offer this encouragement. Please never forget that when you choose to carry out your responsibilities in an excellent way, you absolutely make a difference in the quality of life of everyone in the communities you serve, sometimes in large ways, sometimes in small ways, whether or not members realize it or not, and whether or not they ever say “thank you.” The only person who can take that truth away from you is you. Please don’t let that happen

So there you have it. Thirty years of meetings boiled down to twenty-six tips over five blogs. Have you found any that work for you that we missed? Let us know!

Meeting Tips #4 – Little Things Set a Tone & Help You Get Stuff Done

“Great things are not done by impulse, but by a series of small things brought together.” – George Eliot

Excellence does not come about by accident. Nor is it typically the result of heroic leaps and bounds. It is usually the accumulation of incremental actions, the compounded interest earned from habits applied to what might seem to be insignificant details. Exceptionally productive meetings are no different. They don’t happen by accident. And there are several little things that can make a big difference.

Association board members are fiduciaries. The principle applies equally to large associations with multi-million dollar budgets and a 20-home HOA. Board members are taking care of other people’s stuff. That’s serious. It’s important to do good business at meetings.

Room Logistics Make a Difference

It can be a challenge to stay sharp when you are meeting in someone’s living room. This can be a challenge for communities without appropriate meeting space on site, or without easy distance of a local school, library, fire hall, or other suitable locations. The manager of one upscale condominium association told me of a client who had to aggressively recommend that they cease serving wine before meetings in the board president’s unit. The indecipherable minutes helped to make the case for her. I doubt the wine would have been an issue if the meeting wasn’t held in someone’s living room!

Once a suitable space has been identified, room setup helps to set a tone. Tables set in a “V” or “U” configuration help board members to communicate effectively. It also helps attendees to understand that it’s the board’s business meeting, not a community chat. Consider the audience. In the case of one client who holds their meetings in a very pleasant community room, I realized the location of the couches and chairs led to attendees sitting at the back of the room. Some had to turn their heads to see the board. After the first meeting, we re-arranged the furniture to bring the audience closer to the front of the room, which made it easier to follow the meeting. It looked less like a living room and more like a meeting hall, with as much of the seating faced towards the board. They still got to sit in comfy furniture, but left the meeting without cricks in their necks! This, along with adjusting the board’s seating arrangements, helped to completely change the tone of the meetings.

Members Are Important!

While the room configuration helps to establish a businesslike tone, it doesn’t need to be inhospitable for the members who have dedicated their valuable time to get involved in the community – an effort that should not go unappreciated.

One exceptional client from my management days makes a habit of asking if the meeting is the first for any attendees, whether they are new move-ins or not. They are invited to introduce themselves, and the board welcomes them warmly and introduces themselves and the management team in the front of the room. It’s an excellent way to set a tone for the meeting.

Taking the time to explain the Why to members during meetings is a small thing that helps everyone. This is where situational awareness  becomes very useful. If the chair is aware of the audience and can read the room, she may pick up on disconnects and side comments. Other board members should stay engaged as well to assist and support the chair.

If someone doesn’t know why the board doesn’t allow comments from the floor throughout the meeting, find an opportune time to explain why in positive terms. Avoid emphasizing what they can’t do – help them to see how they can provide input and ask questions. Is there a hot topic on the agenda and an unusually large crowd chomping at the bit to participate in the open forum portion of the meeting? Remember some of them may be first time attendees who don’t understand the structure of the meeting. It pays to walk the group through the process up front, highlighting that time limits or other meeting management systems are in place to make sure everyone can be heard. Avoid the natural tendency for defensiveness. Embrace the dialogue. Look for opportunities to educate and communicate shared values.

Goals

All these little things can help create a space where the board can do the business of the association more effectively. It won’t always work. These days, civility and respect seem to be in increasingly short supply. In a world that seems determined to create Us vs. Them paradigms, leaders have a challenge. In reality, there is no Them. There is only Us. It is vitally important for board members to embody and promote these values. The last blog in this series will explore some final tips to help. Stay tuned!

Meeting Tips #3 – O Say Can You Hear?

Community association boards do the bulk of their business at board meetings (or at least, they SHOULD). It can be tough for community members to observe the proceedings and resist the urge to chime in from the audience, especially on hot topics. This happens often with residents who do not understand that community associations are based on the representative democracy model. Yes, the board is ultimately responsible for picking the community center wallpaper…it’s not a community vote…

Wise boards do everything they can to avoid operating in a vacuum. They know they are responsible for making decisions that benefit the membership as a whole. They also learn that group leadership is a messy business. The odds are less than great that everyone will be happy with every decision. Convincing a vocal minority that they have been heard can be tough.

Meetings are an opportunity to build community through listening. Sometimes the format of board meetings can create unintentional landmines in this regard. Here are a few ways to flip the script and make opportunity.

Owner Comment Period

Many state statutes require a period of time be set aside for owners to ask questions and make comments. Even if it might not be required in your location, it’s a terrific provision. There are a few nuances to how a board administrates the comment period that will take full advantage of listening opportunities.

  • Timing: Some communities choose to have a comment period on the agenda before action items to allow for input. Others find that most of the comments and questions are on topics unrelated to the action items and find it more beneficial to put comment periods later in the agenda. I had one client that found it most effective to have two short open forums: the first for input before the board discussed action items, and the second one after, to allow members to bring up items unrelated to action items.

The key is to thoughtfully consider how members can best contribute to the discussion and be heard. Remember – you never know where the next great idea might come from! Be ready to hear it.

  • Following up: A typical refrain from some community association members is that things are discussed at meetings but nothing ever happens. Sometimes the culprit is how the owner comment period is conducted. Some matters are simple management issues that can be addressed on the spot. However, boards are wise not to make decisions on new issues brought up in open forum when they are unprepared. Some boards use the stock phrase, “We will take that under advisement,” but they don’t actually have a system to close the loop. Here are a few tips to help boards listen, which will also give their community members the confidence they actually are:

  1. Take notes while the member is talking to capture the main points.
  2. Ask questions for clarification as needed,
  3. Restate. A great phrase I’ve used is, “So I think I heard…”
  4. Embrace passion. If an owner is upset, they care. There’s energy there. Perhaps there’s an ad hoc committee lurking, just waiting to be formed, that will help the board turn a problem into a solution.
  5. If a matter is worth discussion, add it to new business in the meeting agenda.
  6. Make it clear if a matter is delegated to management, a committee, or a board member.  Who has the ball?
  7. If a matter would require an unbudgeted expense, you can indicate that it might be included in next year’s budget discussion and direct that it be added to the budget file. Just make sure it’s included in the first draft, (a.k.a. “the kitchen sink version” – for more on that concept, CLICK HERE) of the budget, no matter how wacky the idea might seem.
  8. Make sure the manager or another party is responsible for producing a meeting task list. The list should include not only the follow-up items from motions, but also all the little details noted above that would get lost otherwise.

Hint: If owners are using valuable meeting time to bring up day-to-day management issues, it may be a sign your processes are not clear. Asking a member if they have reported the matter to management is an appropriate response. If they have, but believe the response was inadequate, you can let them know you appreciate the report and will help to connect the dots between the owner and management. If they have not, it’s a golden opportunity. Listen to the report, then let them know management will take care of it. Then remind them that in the future, they need not wait for board meetings to make requests. That message reinforces the association’s service procedures and helps all participants understand the best way to be heard in such matters.

Recognition

Don’t forget to thank volunteers and managers for their efforts. Thank members for their comments. Recognize good questions. If a member discussed a problem, show empathy for the member even if they were a part of the problem. Practicing recognition promotes active listening and demonstrates the emotional intelligence that helps members know they have been heard.

Hot Topics

Some disagree with me, but I’ve always recommended that those chairing meetings open the floor for specific comments on particularly contentious issues to allow members to express themselves. This uncommon action of adding impromptu comment periods proves the board is serious about member input. You can still set a time limit to keep things going. You can also request that if someone else had already made a point a member wishes to make, that they make a simple statement of agreement and do not make repetitive points.

Is This the Right Meeting?

Board meetings are designed to conduct business. If the member comment period is taking over the meeting, the community is telling you something. You have bigger issues to address. When board meetings become free-for-alls, it has become a de facto “town hall” meeting. It also may be telling you the community is deep in the weeds and needs to take a step back and do some serious planning. Board meetings are great for doing the basic business of the community. But they are lousy for town hall meetings and for strategic planning.

Town hall meetings are great for either collecting or disseminating information. No business is done, just communication. It amazes me that most community associations never have a yearly planning session soon after annual meetings to discuss the goals for the upcoming board year. If the community needs to hire an outside facilitator to help plan and conduct town hall or strategic planning meetings, it can be well worth the investment.

Carpe Momentum

Meetings are opportunities to lead, to connect, and to build community. Listening is at the heart of all three. Why not seize the moment?

Meeting Tips #2 – Prepare TO Die? Or is it Prepare OR Die? Same thing!

Classic line from “The Princess Bride”

The Five Ps

Proper preparation prevents poor performance. Think about meetings of any type you’ve attended where the participants were well prepared. Quality discussion, good decisions, the right balance of thorough and efficient, right?

Board members are fiduciaries. They have been entrusted with taking care of association members’ assets. Their decisions can make a difference in the quality of life for everyone who lives in the community. Meetings are where decisions are made. Good performance is important. Preparation is crucial.

Are You Prepared?

Signs your board may need to focus on meeting preparation:
• “That’s covered in your Board package”
• “I’m not ready to make a decision”
• The sound of a board member ripping open his board package upon sitting down at the table.
• “Did we get that (report, proposal, memo, etc.)?”
• Endless discussion on details, possibly involving eye rolls, facepalms, and other frustrated non-verbal communication
• Pattern of last-minute additions to the meeting agenda
• Asking the same questions that were answered last month

End result: Death by meeting.

Two Sides of Preparation

Like so many other situations in community associations this can be a system issue, a performance issue, or a combination of the two. Be clear on the real problem.

System: Are those responsible for providing information in advance of the board meeting (managers, board members, committees) providing adequate data for the board to make informed decisions? Does the packaging of the information work for the participants (electronic or hard copy, visuals, analysis, the organization of data, etc.)? Does the established schedule for board package delivery give participants sufficient time to thoroughly review it?

Performance: Do participants read the board package? Are the packages delivered on time? Do the packages answer questions or raise them?

Preparation Tips

Board Members: One of the primary duties of board members is to read. If you need more time, make sure the expectation is clear. If the data does not speak to you, share how you’d like it to be presented. If you have questions about a subject, ask about it before the meeting. Make sure committee members and others who contribute to the board package are aware of the schedule for meetings and package delivery.

Managers: Board packages are your opportunity to help the board do its job and to gain respect as a professional. A bunch of proposals and memos attached to an agenda is not how a professional prepares a board package. Never throw data at your client. Review, analyze, frame, and explain. Review information with a critical eye with your client in mind, anticipate the questions they will ask and provide the answers in the package. Present information in a way that speaks to your specific client. Ask if the board needs their packages sooner.

Don’t Be Inigo’s Victim

You didn’t kill his dad. You don’t have to prepare to die.   But you do need to prepare.  Remember the “Five Ps” and escape death by meeting.  Together, managers, committee members, and boards can create and execute a system that helps everyone to efficiently and sufficiently prepare and do great work in the service of their communities.

Not Your Father’s Agenda – Meeting Tips #1

The difference between a productive one-hour meeting and a mind-numbing, four-hour marathon can sometimes be the formatting of the agenda.

Roadmaps help you to get to your destination and get there on time. Your meeting agenda can do the same thing. A few years ago, some co-conspirators and I put on a mock board meeting at a CAI local chapter conference to illustrate the wrong way to conduct a meeting. Here was our agenda (click on the image to enlarge):

Clearly, we used a bit of hyperbole to call out plenty of dysfunction on the Gates of Hell board. There are plenty of nuances (and some not too subtle points) to pick apart. There are two features of this agenda to consider that are commonly used in community associations: (1) the order of business and (2) a missing element. Both can make a big difference.

Prioritize the Important Stuff

The Gates of Hell agenda follows a typical order of business. It does a good job of keeping topics organized, but it can have an unintended consequence. The decision items are the most important things the board will do. Those decisions will have the biggest impact on the quality of life in the community and frequently its financial health. Most board meetings are held in the evenings, with decision items often listed at the end. How fresh and mentally sharp are you at 7PM? And if that’s the start of the meeting, by the time you get to new business, you might be toast. If it’s a marathon meeting, you might be making a six-figure contract approval decision at 10 o’clock at night. How clear-headed will your thinking be while making a decision that will impact the whole community?

The solution? Re-order the agenda. Put action items in as early as possible, before all the reports. Make decisions when you are at your sharpest, not when you might be tempted to get a vote over with as fast as possible because you are tired and cranky.

The Missing Element – A Timed Agenda

A timed agenda can also make a world of difference. If each agenda item is timed, it gives the group a target. It gives the chair a tool to help move the meeting along. Other board members can support that chair by referencing where you are as compared to the agenda. Don’t be a dictator and cut off discussion or reports citing the timing on the agenda. It’s most effective as a gentle nudge and reminder. Simple but effective.

There may be a benefit in taking a hard look at your starting time. I’ve had some clients that intentionally scheduled meetings to start before members have the opportunity to get dinner. Another client Intentionally scheduled their meetings early on Seinfeld night because it motivated them to be efficient. Both of these strategies worked but required board members to be disciplined in another area – preparation. 

Let the Data Drive the Discussion

Change is hard.  New is hard.  Fear makes bad news hard to take.  Is it any wonder that from time to time community association managers, advisors and volunteer leaders find themselves at odds with community members or each other?  Sooner or later, they all will find themselves duty bound to share a message someone won’t want to hear.

Money Hurts

This happens a lot when money is involved.  People hate to spend money especially when they cannot see the value of the expense.  Here’s where community associations remind members of the government, either consciously or subconsciously.  I recall hearing a quote from the Wall Street Journal along the lines of, “People have the same warm emotional connection to their homeowners association as they do the Internal Revenue Service.”  Ouch!

Drill down a little and it makes sense.  Citizens expect infrastructure and services, but they may chafe at paying the taxes that make them possible.  Why?  In a word, trust.  Governments, with their inevitable bureaucracies, have complicated, enormous budgets that the average citizen cannot comprehend.  This makes it difficult, if not impossible, to tell how well utilized those taxes are.  The end result?  Distrust and an assumption of waste…or worse.  Association Fees are a community association’s tax.  If members are not clear that their money is being spent wisely, it’s tough to take.  Members may well default to their assumptions of waste…or worse.

See The Enemy

If you are going to ask for higher fees, spend a wad of cash, or change anything people are familiar with, you need to be ready to explain why.  You may need to combat distrust.  Fortunately, this is much easier to accomplish on the micro level of a community association than is it for the Federal Government!  The information might be somewhat complicated, but it can be available and explainable.

If the direction is sound, it’s based on sound data.  But members may not be aware of the data they need to trust the messenger.  And until the messenger is trusted, the message is lost.

There are two insidious enemies that can erode the trust of your members:

  1. The Law of Omitted Data: The concept is that if a person has some knowledge about a subject but does not have all the facts, it is likely that person’s degree of misunderstanding will grow exponentially over time.  The impact of the law can be devastating in the group dynamic, especially when the Telephone Game factor gets added to the mix.  I’ve seen this blow communities apart.
  1. Theoryworld: The absence of experience or real life information doesn’t stop people from trying to be experts. We imagine scenarios and responses and all kinds of possible permutations and combinations of things that might happen.  Discussion and arguments in Theoryworld last for-EV-er!  They have an annoying tendency to bear little resemblance to reality and waste valuable time and energy.  Theoryworld is exhausting and leads to regrettable decisions.

When data is bad or missing, misinformed opinions and fear can set in and emotions can run high.  It gets personal.  People mistakenly see each other as the enemy.  The real enemies, the Law of Omitted Data and Theoryworld, are hiding just under the surface.

How can you vanquish these enemies?  How can you fill in the blanks and bridge the gap between theory and reality?  How can your group make good decisions and actually get things done?

Fight the Real Enemies

Your first reaction to manifestations of the Law of Omitted Data or Theoryworld may be to correct or defend.  Don’t.  That adds fuel to the ego-driven fire, even if you are 100% right.  Rather than counteracting bad data, seek to fill in the gaps of understanding with good data.  Your goal isn’t to win an argument.  Ego is a major part of the problem.  Elevate the dialogue from ego-based to principle-based– from emotional opinion-based to fact-based.  In so doing, you create a space in which the data can drive the discussion.

The presentation of the data requires more than logic.  It means acknowledging ego and emotion, both yours and others’.  This is another real life scenario where gobs of emotional intelligence will make a massive difference.   Here are a few strategies to get there:

  • Find trustable outside experts. A message from a disinterested third-party can have an impact.  Share their information or let them do the talking.
  • Show and tell. A picture really does paint a thousand words.  And seeing it up close and personal makes things real.  Cruddy pipes, scary boiler rooms, a mudslide behind the pool.  You don’t have to sell it.  Just allow people to see reality.
  • Show your work like doing arithmetic in the third grade. Even if the level of detail seems excessive, the fact that the research was done and you are willing to show your process can build bridges and confidence.
  • Conversely, make it clear the presentation of detailed data isn’t a snow job. Bullet point summaries, charts and graphs– anything that aids visualization is good.  The supporting materials can be in the back.
  • Accept all options and ideas at first, even if every bone in your body tells you they never work. Instead of saying “no” up front, let the group decision making process say “no.”
  • Try to use more questions than declarative statements

Hail Victory!

Don’t worry about making a case.  Create a space where the case makes itself.  Trust the process.  Be patient – time will tell the truth.  Let the data drive the discussion.

What strategies have you used to defeat the Law of Omitted Data and Theoryworld?

EVILuation

No, that’s not a typo.

The Wrong Way To Do The Right Thing

I read yet another formulaic, extremely detailed performance evaluation the other day. It was everything I detest about human resource management these days. Oh sure, it had lots of buzzwords and high sounding aspirational phrases – pages and pages of them. And it was devoid of any substantive clarity…or hope. It did such a great job covering the supervisor’s butt that I suggested he write a book called Toasty Buns: How to Completely CYA by Managing Without Leading. It set up the organization to have the flexibility to take whatever action it wanted to without getting itself in legal hot water, while simultaneously leaving the employee confused and demotivated. In my opinion, it was a complete waste of a perfectly good tree.

Welcome to your annual review, Mr. Simpson…I’ve been asked to co-present with lawyers for the Community Association Institute on employment practices three times now. Before that, I thought insurance and risk management were the most challenging areas in community association management. Not anymore. Employment law is one of the most complicated and landmine-ridden areas in business. It can be intimidating and it is very easy to run afoul of the law with no malice whatsoever in our heart. Documentation of performance evaluations is a big deal. I get it.

Here’s the problem. Evaluations like the one I just puked through can easily become a vicious cycle and part of a self-fulfilling prophecy. The process breeds defensiveness, which kills motivation. It demoralizes team members. It reinforces bureaucracy and cripples leadership. It protects the organization against lawsuits while simultaneously protecting it against a workforce ever reaching its potential. It discourages staff from helping the organization to become wildly successful, which then requires more negative comments on evaluations, thus completing the cycle. Essentially, the process of evaluating and documenting performance can actually work against what the exercise was supposed to achieve in the first place – optimal performance! The lawyers are the ONLY ones who are happy.

Welcome to your annual review, Mr. Simpson…

Is it any wonder that, according to Gallup, upwards of 70% of American workers are classified as either “not engaged” or “actively disengaged”?

Is it any wonder that companies like Adobe, Dell, IBM, Deloitte, Gap and even GE (yes – the GE of the famed Jack Welch era “stack ranking” evaluation system ) have walked away from traditional performance evaluation models?

Evaluations, as we’ve known them, are EVIL. Hence, the title of this blog.

Can We Get This Right?

I think so. I think you can protect an organization and benefit it by setting the stage for team members to be at their best, thereby contributing to the success of that organization.

Here’s the Cliff’s Notes version of one way to accomplish the task:

  1. Have an intentional culture.
  2. Memorialize the values and the culture in writing. Make it the FIRST part of your butt-covering, legalese-saturated personnel manual. Explain The Why, and how it’s an awesome thing.
  3. In the FIRST paragraph of every position description, memorialize how each team member contributes to those values and the culture, and ultimately to the success of the organization in a win-win paradigm.
  4. Make sure every new hire has a goal list of time-sensitive and key ongoing deliverables that relate to values and culture in order to create a metric and mutual expectation. Help everyone to see what success looks like.
  5. Engage in regular discussion about how things are going. Find people doing things right and reward it. Set dates in your calendar to make it happen. MBWA (look it up).
  6. Plan to have a conversation about how team members are doing, based primarily on the stated values and culture, and highlighting goal list items or other specific, clearly communicated deliverables. Everybody writes down some talking points so they can remember them.
  7. Have a conversation, NOT an EVILuation. Reach areas of agreement on areas of success and celebrate them. Note opportunities for improvement and set a new metric. The goal of the collaboration is agreement, a plan, and ownership. If there are disagreements in some part of the assessment, allow the team member’s dissent to be recorded. Just make sure the expectation moving forward is clear and included in the plan.
  8. Type it up.  Review it together for accuracy. Everyone signs off.
  9. Execute the plan.
  10. Rinse, repeat.

Performance evaluation by discussion and collaborative action plans make sense when it’s in the context of culture. It makes sense when that culture is founded in shared values with personal and group accountability. Culture and the other best practices that set the framework for this model will be the topic of other blogs. But you don’t have to wait to get those things lined up perfectly to change the way you think about and execute your evaluation process. Do that now. The process can help to kickstart an intentional culture.

This is NOT fluffy feel-good stuff. This is hard. And it works. As Tom Peters comments in The Excellence Dividend, “Effective evaluations emerge from a series of loosely structured, continuing conversations, not from filling out a form once every six months or year.” PREACH, Mr. Peters, PREACH!

It’s not a Pollyanna. It’s about getting things done and being grown-ups. You’ll still be able to figure out if people are working out or not. And the written part will keep the lawyers happy. Most importantly, the evaluation process will actually do what it is intended to do – make sure everyone is clear about the organization’s goals and their role in achieving them.

Let’s get this done!